Earticle

초록

영어

problems or to adapt to the changing security environment, its past experiences were not satisfactory. The current reform initiative, “Defense Reform 2020,” also seems not to have achieved tangible outcomes yet, though more than four years have passed since its inception.
If South Korean military really wants to achieve some results out of this reform initiative, it needs to implement more vigorously the programs outlined in Defense Reform Act. It should increase the pace of change by adopting Change and Fix Strategy in light of a few lessons from U.S.
Defense Secretary Rumsfeld’s Transformation and its own failures in the past. While the basic framework for Defense Reform 2020 is to achieve the goals along 15 years in an evolutionary manner, it is not that risky for South Korean military to hasten the implementation of some proven programs.

목차

Abstract
 Introduction
 Review on Strategy of Change in Defense Reform
 Two Patterns of Change
  Diagram 1 Two Patterns of Change
  Change and Fix Strategy
  Set and Change Strategy
  Analysis of Two Strategies
 The Case of U.S. Military’s Transformation
  Background of Transformation
  Analysis of the Applied Strategy
 The Case of South Korea’s Defense Reform 2020
  Background of Defense Reform 2020
  Analysis of the Applied Strategies
 Conclusion
 References

키워드

저자

• Hwee Rhak Park [ Professor, Korea National Defense University, Korea ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  평화학연구 [THE JOURNAL OF PEACE STUDIES]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1738-2580

• 수록기간

  2004~2024

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 340 DDC 320