Earticle

초록

영어

Borrowing by the government policy in the 16th century became a common housing type of farmers coming into the city in the 17th century. The housing supply method of the military, a class of farmers coming into the city received Gongdae(public sites) including Mohwagwan(慕華館) and Taepyoongwan(太平館) from their unit such as Hunryun-dogam(訓鍊都監) or Au Young Chung(御營廳). Therefore, their dwelling sites were prepared collectively through Gongdae(公垈) borrowing, differently from other farmers coming into the city. This finally became the cause of formation of regional dwelling sites in the Hanseongbu. The soldiers who came up to the city in the 17th century resided by borrowing private sites(personal Gadae) besides the national Gongdae. However, since the private-site borrowing could be sued easily, differently from Gongdae borrowing, it was on shaky ground where they could lose their place of residence. Borrowers who leased private sites had to receive an Iban(立案) thoroughly because they could lose the right of the leased land without the Iban when they were sued for Gadae(家垈). With poor housing conditions, borrowers were in the unstable situation where the leased land could be taken away as an aspect of pillaging by a powerful or loyal family in Hanseongbu with the owner residing in the provinces. In particular, in case of private-site borrowing differently from Gongdae borrowing, there were many cases of legal action so that borrowers had to clearly recognize and confirm if the land was owned by and who was its owner. As to the period of lease, Gongdae borrowing was almost permanent while privatesite borrowing was flexible except that the owner went down into the country. Also, borrowers paid a certain amount to their owner as taxes. While paying in a lump-sum like a today’s deposit money, they paid once a year as seen through a case that they paid taxes yearly. The government’s protection measures about such borrowers didn’t appear in the late Joseon Dynasty. A borrower or a tenant only got a tax refund when the owner’s house had a trouble, which turned out that their property right was under protection to some extent. The method to secure the residence right about borrowing could not but receive the government’s Iban stating the dwelling period or conditions of borrowing. However, even in this case the borrower had to clearly recognize details of Gadae to lease, the location of resident households, and its ownership since when both litigant parties received the Iban, the party who first issued the Iban could win a lawsuit.

목차

I. 머리말
 II. 16세기 漢城府 주거형태의 특징
 III. 漢城府內 軍兵의 家垈 지급과 주거 양상
  1. 군병의 漢城府 유입과 실태
  2. 군병의 家垈 지급과 借入
 IV. 가옥소송을 통해 본 漢城府 軍兵 借入者의 실태
 V. 맺음말
 참고문헌
 ABSTRACT

키워드

가대지급 사대차입 공대차입 차입 군병 상경이농인 Gadae(Residence Sites) Payment private-site borrowing Gongdae borrowing Gongdae(public sites) Borrowing Hanseongbu housing type military a class of famers coming into city housing policy 私垈借入 公垈借入 借入 軍兵

저자

• 유승희 [ Yoo, Seung-Hee | 서울시립대학교 HK교수 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물