In this paper, for data collection, the questionnaire survey was conducted in several regions in Japan such as Tohoku, Kanto:・Koshinetsu, To:kai, Hokuriku, Kinki, Tsu:goku, Shikoku, and the Kyusyu. The questionnaire contained the grammaticality judgmen with regard to the sentences which include Epistemic adverbs (e.g.Kitto, Tabun, Osoraku, Do:mo, Do:yara, etc.) and interrogative forms. The data were analyzed with focus on the regional difference related to the meaning usage and the meaning function of the adverbs with the co-occurrence relation to interrogative Forms. The findings are as follows; 1) The significant regional difference with the Epistemic meaning usage was observed in the grammaticality judgement for the Epistemic adverbs, such as Kitto, Tabun, Osoraku, Do:mo, Do:yara, Moshikasite, Hyottoshite, Tashika, and Masaka. 2) On the other hand, there was no significant regional difference with regard to the adverbs which do not contain the Epistemic meaning such as Zettai, Kanarazu, Tashikani, Tashika, and Masaka. In addition, these adverbs were used in the meaning usage of ‘confirmation.’ The results showed that the difference regarding the grammaticality judgment in the same sentences might have been influenced by the individual linguistic intuition to the sentence. Furthermore, we can expect that the individual linguistic intuition has been affected by the usage of language at home, school, and the community that the speakers belong to. As a result, the implication that this study might have is that ‘regional common language grammar’ may exist and this can explain the regional difference.
동북아시아문화학회 [The Association of North-east Asian Cultures]
설립연도
2000
분야
복합학>학제간연구
소개
동북아시아 문화의 다양성과 정체성을 연구 토론하고, 지역내 문화 교류의 다양한 모습을 연구하고 문화변동의 큰 틀을 집적함으로써 우리 민족 문화 및 상대 민족의 문화적 터전을 이해하여 문화공동체적 특성을 계발하고 상호 관련성의 강화를 유도하는 학술활동을 통해 동북아시아의 문화발전에 이바지함.