Earticle

초록

영어

The purpose of this article is to clarify one section of the thought situation of 1920's while doing it mainly on law thought of Minobe Tatsukichi and Miyazawa Toshiyoshi. The conventional study drew two people as master and pupil relations. The Tennoukikansethu- jiken that brought decisive switch for life of the scholar of both was a historic case to symbolize such relations on this occasion. However, seeing from a different point of view, the relations of both are different. The methodology of the study of both was in particular entirely different. Minobe who played an active part in 1910's thought that his study of the constitution as the tool which realized political justice mainly. The political justice that he pursued accorded with the political aim of the then Taisho-democracy. Therefore Minobe was able to become a leading political thinker to lead the times. Against this, Miyazawa formed his thought in 1920's. 1920's was the times when party politics established it. However, the politics has begun to already decay. The study of Miyazawa departed in such situation. His study came under strong influence of such a political environment. He was affected by Neo-Kantianism to distinguish Sein from Sollen. Since then Miyazawa aims for studying law as the existence. The scientific study of the constitution that he pursued came out of influence of Neo-Kantianism in those days. In article, I want to highlight an atmosphere of the times of such 1920's while paying attention to difference of Minobe and Miyazawa on thought.

목차

序論
 本論
 第1章 社會科學における存在と當爲
 第2章 美濃部憲法學と純粹文學
 第3章 科學的法律學の樹立 - 學說二元論
 結論
 參考文獻
 초록

키워드

저자

• 李秀烈 [ 이수열 | 부산대학교 한국민족문화연구소 HK전임연구원 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  동북아 문화연구 [Journal of North-east Asian Cultures]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1598-3692

• 수록기간

  2001~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 910 DDC 950