‘Spring in a Small Town’was met with both words of praise and criticism as soon as it opened in September, 1948. When most of the reviews were bad it closed, just one week after it opened. The long takes, unique shooting angle and narration style of the film received good reviews from many film critics. It stood the test of time in terms of film language and technique, but when the film opened in Shanghai in 1948, it was criticized for its ‘decadent and sick’contents. However, around thirty years later, ‘Spring in a Small Town’ was evaluated as a model national film by a Chinese film company, and the director, Fei Mu, was praised as a pioneer of Chinese films. China had to make a choice in 1948. It was an important time when people had to decide what position to take, and whether they would stay in China or leave. I have chosen to write about Fei Mu because of his choice of versatility that distances himself from mainstream topics of the unique time of 1948. I decided to write about Fei Mu to look into the diverse forms of early Japanese film history through Fei Mu, who combined western film theory and traditional Chinese aesthetics to form his own type of Chinese national film. This study aimed to examine Fei Mu’s pursuit and materialization of film aesthetic through his work, ‘Spring in a Small Town,’ and examined the cultural psychology of Chinese people in 1948 through symbols in the film, such as a small town and castle wall. ‘Spring in a Small Town’ can be seen as a symbol of the agonies of Chinese intellects in Fei Mu’s time.
목차
1. 들어가면서 2. 소도시 공간을 통해서 본 중국민족 문화심리 3. 페이무 중국전통 영화미학의 모색 4. 끝내면서 參考文獻 초록
키워드
주변성중국민족영화형식문화심리소도시성벽VersatilityForms of chinese national filmscultural psychologysmall towncastle wall
동북아시아문화학회 [The Association of North-east Asian Cultures]
설립연도
2000
분야
복합학>학제간연구
소개
동북아시아 문화의 다양성과 정체성을 연구 토론하고, 지역내 문화 교류의 다양한 모습을 연구하고 문화변동의 큰 틀을 집적함으로써 우리 민족 문화 및 상대 민족의 문화적 터전을 이해하여 문화공동체적 특성을 계발하고 상호 관련성의 강화를 유도하는 학술활동을 통해 동북아시아의 문화발전에 이바지함.