Earticle

현재 위치 Home

미국에서의 복수당사자 중재에 관하여
Multiparty Arbitration in the U.S.A

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    원광대학교 법학연구소 바로가기
  • 간행물
    원광법학 KCI 등재 바로가기
  • 통권
    제25권 제1호 (2009.03)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.341-369
  • 저자
    김상균
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A104754

원문정보

초록

영어
The majority of arbitrations are conducted by a individually single procedures which have two parties and are governed by one contract with one arbitration agreement between two parties. Recently, however, arbitrations involving multiparty disputes have been increased, which arise in the context of the more complex international transaction, insurance and construction, etc. Such disputes may concern more than one contractual agreement, and one or more of those agreements may not contain arbitration clauses. Under this circumstances, the issues are whether arbitration is enforceable when no all parties to the dispute are bound to arbitrate. A party's ability to arbitrate any disputes arises from its consent as a signatory to a contract between himself and other party which includes an arbitration clause. Non-signatory to a contract with arbitral agreement, therefore, should not be bound to arbitrate any disputes without his consent to do so. But a related party that has not signed an agreement to arbitrate may be compelled or permitted to participate in an arbitration when he is found in circumstances of piercing the corporate veil, principal-agent relationship, assumption of agreement to arbitrate, or estoppel. Civil Procedure Rules permits the consolidation of litigations, joinder of parties or claims into a single procedure, and the third party's intervention to it, where common issues of law and fact exit, for reasons of economy and consistency of the judgments. Similarly, in the arbitration procedure, arbitral tribunals or courts may permit or order consolidations, joinders, or interventions with all parties's consents. The U.S. class/classwide arbitration or an arbitral class action is a hybrid procedure of class action and mandatory binding arbitration, in which any dispute is required to be resolved through an arbitration by an agreement. While the AAA has the rules for this classwide arbitration, the Federal Arbitration Act or the Uniform Arbitration Act don't provide for it at all. For the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution, courts' assistances will be necessary to determine class issues for class certification, notice, adequacy of class representation, and settlement, etc.

목차

Ⅰ. 서 론
 Ⅱ. 중재절차의 당사자
  1. 의의
  2. 비서명자에 대한 당사자적격의 확대
  3. 복수 당사자 중재절차의 성립
 Ⅲ. 클래스 중재의 성립
  1. 서
  2. 클래스 중재의 성립 및 절차 일반
  3. 관련 쟁점
 Ⅳ. 결 론
 참 고 문 헌
 〈ABSTRACT〉
 토 론 문

키워드

복수당사자 중재 중재절차의 병합 중재당사자의 병합 중재청구의 병합 집단 중재 클래스 중재. Joinder of Parties Joinder of Claims Intervention Class Arbitration Multiparty Arbitration Consolidation of Arbitration.

저자

  • 김상균 [ Kim, Sang-Gyun | 청주대학교 법과대학 법학부 부교수, 법학박사. ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    원광대학교 법학연구소 [THE LAW RESEARCH INSTITUTE WONKWANG UNIVERSTIY]
  • 설립연도
    1961
  • 분야
    사회과학>법학
  • 소개
    법에 대한 이론적 · 실제적 연구를 수행하고 그 결과를 발표하여 한국과 지역사회의 법률문화의 발전에 기여함을 목적으로 설립되었으며 법학일반이론과 법학교육방법 등의 연구와 법률구조안내 및 상담을 한다

간행물

  • 간행물명
    원광법학 [Journal of Law research]
  • 간기
    계간
  • pISSN
    1598-429X
  • eISSN
    2508-4526
  • 수록기간
    1962~2025
  • 등재여부
    KCI 등재
  • 십진분류
    KDC 360 DDC 340

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 원광법학 제25권 제1호

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장