Earticle

초록

영어

The paper is to study the outstanding issues when we are introducing Building Agreement. The study analyzed the mainly following documents,「Proposal for Revision of Architectural Code (200. 5, 2005. 4)」, 「The 2nd and 3rd meeting minutes of 256th Committee of Construction & Transportation in the National Assembly」, 「Evaluation report of Proposal for Partial Revision in Architectural Code」, and also the press releases were referenced in addition to those. As the result of this research several issues were showed up as follows; Firstly, it turned out to be caused misunderstanding about the citizen rights and permissible building types when we introduced Building Agreement without doing fully public relations. Secondly, the limited time to be completed for the system resulted in difficulties for citizen participation due to lacking of consensus. Thirdly, most of people were reluctant to accept the new system when they thought of it as a restriction. Through these analyses, we need to consider the following factors for retrying Building Agreement afterward; 1. fully public relations to be understood by people what the system really intends; 2. reasonable period to be completed; 3. links with its local district unit plan because it controls the local urban planning for the architectural environmental restriction as well as it is familiar system.

목차

Abstract
 1. 서 론
  1.1 연구의 배경 및 목적
  1.2 연구의 범위 및 방법
  1.3 건축협정에 관한 국내 연구동향
 2. 건축협정제도의 개요
  2.1 건축협정제도의 의의
  2.2 건축협정제도의 도입목적
  2.3 건축협정제도의 법적 위치
 3. 건축협정제도의 도입 추진과 쟁점
  3.1 건축협정제도의 도입 추진
 4. 건축협정제도에 관한 쟁점
  4.1 건축협정제도 추진과 종교계와의 갈등
  4.2 국회 법안심사과정의 쟁점
  4.3 쟁점의 내용과 원인
  4.4 건축협정제도에 관한 인식 분석
 5.결 론
 참고문헌

키워드

저자

• 원세용 [ Weon, Se-Yong | 청주대학교 건축공학과 전임강사 ] 교신저자

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  대한건축학회연합논문집 [Journal of the Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea]

• 간기

  격월간

• pISSN

  1229-5752

• 수록기간

  1999~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 540 DDC 690