Earticle

현재 위치 Home

연구논문

실종선고의 취소
The Cancellation of Disappearance Adjudication

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    원광대학교 법학연구소 바로가기
  • 간행물
    원광법학 KCI 등재후보 바로가기
  • 통권
    제24집 제4호 (2008.12)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.377-395
  • 저자
    김대규
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A100273

원문정보

초록

영어
The adjudication of disappearance is regarded as a death by a family court in cases that it is unknown whether an absentee is alive or dead in durative specified term. An absentee sentenced the adjudication of disappearance herby is called a missing person. The interested persons such as the family or creditors are prejudiced when the solid evidence is do not exist if they are neglected in the state that it is unknown whether a missing person is alive or dead in long term and it is lots of potentialities of a missing person's death. Therefore in order to admit the extant spouse's marriage or in order to admit the inheritors's inheritance, it is necessary to settle the legal relation that the central problems of the law of property or the family of law is determined in centered- absentee's address or place of residence. The Article 28 of the Civil Act regulate that the effect of this adjudication of disappearance is "it is regarded as death". That is, the missing person is regarded as death by the adjudication of disappearance. After the adjudication of disappearance, the effect of the adjudication is reversed though the missing person is alive or it is evidence to the contrary. It should be sentenced a cancellation judgement from the family court in order to upset the effect of the adjudication. If a cancellation adjudication is decided, the all private-law-relation that is formed by the effect of the adjudication is got backed to the before state. Therefore, I am trying to study about the effect of the cancellation of the adjudication of disappearance in centered-theories in this paper.

목차

Ⅰ. 서 론
 Ⅱ. 실종선고취소의 요건
  1. 실질적 요건
  2. 형식적 요건
 Ⅲ. 실종선고취소의 절차
 Ⅳ. 실종선고취소의 효과
  1. 소급의 원칙
  2. 소급의 원칙에 대한 예외
  3. 재산취득자의 이득반환
  4. 민법 제29조 1항 단서와 제2항과의 관계
 Ⅴ. 결 론
 참 고 문 헌
 

저자

  • 김대규 [ Kim, Dae-Kyu | 원광대학교 법과대학 법학과 교수, 법학박사. ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    원광대학교 법학연구소 [THE LAW RESEARCH INSTITUTE WONKWANG UNIVERSTIY]
  • 설립연도
    1961
  • 분야
    사회과학>법학
  • 소개
    법에 대한 이론적 · 실제적 연구를 수행하고 그 결과를 발표하여 한국과 지역사회의 법률문화의 발전에 기여함을 목적으로 설립되었으며 법학일반이론과 법학교육방법 등의 연구와 법률구조안내 및 상담을 한다

간행물

  • 간행물명
    원광법학 [Journal of Law research]
  • 간기
    계간
  • pISSN
    1598-429X
  • eISSN
    2508-4526
  • 수록기간
    1962~2026
  • 등재여부
    KCI 등재
  • 십진분류
    KDC 360 DDC 340

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 원광법학 제24집 제4호

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장