Earticle

Home 검색결과

결과 내 검색

발행연도

-

학문분야

자료유형

간행물

검색결과

검색조건
검색결과 : 167
No
1

지역혁신협의회에 대한 도민의 역할

이인재

열린전북 열린전북 2003. 9 통권 제48호 2003.09 pp.88-91

※ 원문제공기관과의 협약에 따라 개인회원에게 무료로 제공됩니다.

2

연재12. 지적 재산권

이인재

대한피부미용학회 대한피부미용학회지 제12권 제6호 통권 제43호 2014.12 pp.767-772

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

This paper examined the meaning, types, characteristics and limitation of copyright as a type of intellectual property which researchers had often faced in the process of presenting and publishing research results. Especially it is focused on some important contents of copyright which researchers must understand in view of research ethics. According to the Korean law of copyright, copyrights are exclusive rights granted by the law system that allow the authors of original works to make copies of the work, make other works derived from the original work, perform or display the work, and distribute, sell, or rent copies of the work. People who perform any of these actions without the permission of copyright holders violate copyrights. Original works include written works, such as books, papers, software, databases, and poems; performances, such as plays or dances; audiovisual recordings, such as movies, music, photographs, and televisions shows; and artistic works, such as paintings and sculpture. A work can be original without being new or novel because the author is the first person to put the work into tangible form. A copyright extends for the lifetime of the author(s) plus 70 years, and may be renewed. It’s very important that researchers should have correct knowledge of copyrights in order not to violate copyright in relation to research ethics. To this end, researchers must practice fair use in compatibly with fair practice within a reasonable limit.

4,000원

3

회의진행법

이인재

한국노동조합총연맹 한국노동조합총연맹 교육자료 교육총서 93-1 노동교본 1993.06 pp.51-69

※ 원문제공기관과의 협약에 따라 모든 이용자에게 무료로 제공됩니다.

4

회의진행법

이인재

한국노동조합총연맹 한국노동조합총연맹 교육자료 교육총서 2000-1 노동교본 2000.06 pp.51-81

※ 원문제공기관과의 협약에 따라 모든 이용자에게 무료로 제공됩니다.

5

연재 8. 멘토링과 실험실 문화

이인재

대한피부미용학회 대한피부미용학회지 제11권 제5호 통권 제36호 2013.10 pp.821-826

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

The mentoring and culture of laboratory in the area of research ethics are very important in the manner in which they ensure the research integrity that contributes to the desirable conduct of research. Generally speaking, all researchers have had mentors. Mentors who may be advisors play a fundamental role in professional development. And they also play a formative role in the ethical development of students (mentee) in the manner in which professional values and ethical standards are conveyed, both consciously and unconsciously. Whether informally or formally structured, therefore, the goal of mentoring is to teach students and researchers about the scientific method, and to teach them how to conduct research responsibly. On the other hand, the culture of laboratory is also an important area of research ethics that has been highlighted continuously because it plays an important role in ensuring research integrity and good research results. Some values such as caring and mutual respect, trust, responsibility, fairness among members in the laboratory are a useful values to prevent conflicts that can occur in the laboratory. We can establish a desirable laboratory culture when professors as a mentor provide a good role model for students in the whole process of research.

4,000원

6

회의진행법

이인재

한국노동조합총연맹 한국노동조합총연맹 교육자료 교육총서 92-1 노동교본 1992.06 pp.89-107

※ 원문제공기관과의 협약에 따라 모든 이용자에게 무료로 제공됩니다.

7

제7차 초등 도덕교육의 실태와 발전 방안

이인재

한국윤리교육학회 윤리교육연구 제4집 2003.10 pp.1-29

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

본 논문의 목적은 2000년부터 순차적으로 적용되기 시작한 제7차 초등학교 도덕과 교육과정이 어떻게 실천되고 있으며, 그 과정에서 어떤 어려움이 있고, 또 무엇을 보완해야 할 것인가에 초점을 두고, 제7차 도덕과 교육과정에 근거한 초등 도덕 수업의 효율화를 위해 어떤 노력들이 초등 현장의 내․외에서 있어야 할 지에 대해 몇 가지 방안을 제시하는데 있다. 본 논문에서 초점을 둔 것은 두 가지로서, 하나는 초등 도덕교육의 위기와 위상이 어떻게 연결되고 있는가? 이며, 다른 하나는, 초등 도덕교육의 현 실태는 어떠하며, 만약 문제점이 있다면 그것을 어떻게 보완해 볼 수 있겠는가? 이다. 초등 도덕교육의 현 실태를 살펴봄에 있어 초등학교 ‘안’의 문제와 ‘밖’의 문제로 나누어 살펴보았으며, 미래 지향적인 초등도덕교육의 발전 방안으로서, 초등 도덕교육에 대한 이론적, 실제적 정당화 근거를 확보하여 초등 도덕교육의 위상 제고, 제7차 도덕과 교육과정의 내실 있는 운영, 초등학교 도덕과 수업의 원리에 대한 체계적인 지식과 활용 능력을 갖추기, 학교 도덕교육을 저해하는 전반적인 교육체제 개선 등을 제시하였다.
The purpose of this paper is to propose the proper ways how to accomplish the goal of moral teaching effectively according to the 7th moral curriculum. To the end, First, I analysed how the 7th moral curriculum is practised, what are difficulties and what is supplemented to solve the problems. While analysing the realities of moral education in the elementary school, I found that all the members of school including teachers and students didn't consider the moral teaching as a important educational activity. This recognition connected, therefore, closely 'the crisis of moral education'. This paper focused on two points. One is how is connected between the crisis of moral education and the present position of moral education in the elementary school. The other is what is the realities of moral education, and if any, what is the problems and how to solve them effectively. In order to examine the realities of moral education, I approached two ways, that is, 'in' and 'out' of the elementary school. The former means the management of moral curriculum, the latter moral environment of home and community as the supporter of moral education in the elementary school. As the proper ways for development of moral education, I proposed the producing of the theoretical and practical rationale of moral education, the promotion of knowledge and using ability in moral teaching and improvement of bad environment around the elementary school.

6,900원

9

연재1. 연구윤리, 왜 필요한가?

이인재

대한피부미용학회 대한피부미용학회지 제10권 제2호 통권 제30호 2012.05 pp.195-204

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

Even though it has been increased the interest of research ethics and progressed research ethics education after Hwang’s scandal in 2005, many researchers have still unconcerned the research ethics and think that it is a kind of restricts which limit researcher’s free research activities. The primary premise of this article is that the research ethics plays an important role to improve researcher, academic community and nation. So I emphasize that according to the integrative approach for an establishment of a desirable research ethics the research ethics consciousness of researcher’s and institution or system to support responsible conduct of research (RCR) should be harmonized. In this paper, I discuss some basic contents of research ethics which researcher must understand and fulfill for RCR, such as the backgrounds, concept and principles, scope, importance of research ethics and task for research ethics establishment.

4,000원

11

생명공학의 윤리적 특성에 관한 생명윤리 교수ㆍ학습 모형 개발

이인재

한국윤리교육학회 윤리교육연구 제7집 2005.04 pp.149-181

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

그동안 학교 생명윤리교육에서는 ‘무엇’을 가르칠 것인가의 문제(내용)에 대해서는 많은 논의를 하고 연구를 해왔으면서도 ‘어떻게’ 그것을 효과적으로 가르칠 것인가의 문제(교수․학습의 방법)에 대해서는 체계적인 연구와 적용이 뒤따르지 못했다. 생명윤리교육이 제대로 효과를 거두기 위해서는 학교 급별 학생들의 발달 수준과 가르쳐야 할 내용적 특성에 적합한 교수․학습 방법이 확립되어야 한다. 이러한 문제 인식하에 본 연구는 우리의 청소년들이 직면하고 있거나 미래에 직면하게 될 생명공학과 관련된 중요한 사회과학적 쟁점들이 무엇이고, 그것은 어떤 특성을 가지고 어떻게 발생하는지를 살펴본 후, 이러한 쟁점이 갖는 복잡하고 풀기 어려운 도덕적 딜레마를 올바르고 합리적으로 판단하고 결정할 수 있는 능력을 기르기 위해 수업 모형을 제시하였다. 본 연구에서 제시한 생명윤리 교수․학습 모형은 생명공학의 윤리적 특성과 생명윤리교육의 원리에 기반을 둔 “상호 토론”을 토대로 하여, 탐구 모델(the inquiry models), 협동학습모델(cooperative learning model), 윤리에 기반을 둔 모델(ethics-based models) 등을 복합적으로 활용하였다.
So far, the bioethics education in school has not been studied or applied systematically how we could teach the bioethics issues, that is the teaching-learning methods, even though we have given a great deal of attention to what to teach them, the contents. It must be established the teaching-learning method which is appropriate the level of students and the content characteristics to teach in order to be effective in bioethics education. This paper based on this point explored what are the important socio-scientific issues related biotechnology which our adolescents face at present or will face in the future, what are their characteristics and how they happen. And it also proposed the effective teaching-learning model which enables students to judge moral dilemmas having socio-scientific issues reasonably and decide rightly. This model are based on the inquiry models, the cooperative learning model, and ethics-based models in considering the ethical characteristics of biotechnology, the principle of bioethics education, peer transaction discussion.

7,500원

12

연재3. 표절과 올바른 인용

이인재

대한피부미용학회 대한피부미용학회지 제10권 제4호 통권 제32호 2012.11 pp.739-745

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

Plagiarism is related with the ethical and the legal problem which researchers will be careful. Plagiarism is defined as using ideas, words and verbatim of others as if they were his/her own without proper citations. The issue involved in the use of others’ ideas, words and verbatim without proper citations is academic dishonesty required for all academic researchers and students as well. Plagiarism, therefore, is associated with methods of citation. The main aims of this paper is to understand plagiarism which is one of research misconduct. To the end, I examined the concept, characteristics, types of plagiarism and also searched the criteria of plagiarism and the honest and right academic writing to prevent plagiarism. There are various types of plagiarism. I discussed mainly four types of plagiarism; text plagiarism(word-for word plagiarism), paraphrasing plagiarism, patch writing, plagiarism of the form of a source. To avoid the deliberate or undeliberate attempt to plagiarize, researchers should write ethically. This means researcher use proper amount of quotations, which means their work should not be filled with quotations. If one uses too many quotations or does not give credit in accordance with the accepted fair practices of the relevant research community in their creative work written on the basis of their own or another’s work, this constitutes plagiarism.

4,000원

13

다문화사회에서의 초등학교 반편견교육

이인재

한국윤리교육학회 윤리교육연구 제22집 2010.08 pp.253-272

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

본 연구는 최근 우리 사회가 다문화사회로 급속하게 변화하면서 우리 사회가 가진 타인종과 타문화에 대한 편견을 해소하기 않으면 사회통합의 측면에서 큰 문제가 된다는 전제하여, 또한 반편견교육은 어릴 때부터 체계적으로 이루어질 때 효과적이라는 점에서 초등학교에서의 반편견교육, 무엇을, 어떻게 할 것인가?에 대해 논의하였다. 이를 위해 편견 및 반편견, 반편견교육의 의미, 반편견교육의 중요성과 내용 및 범위, 그리고 효과적인 방법에 대해 살펴보았다. 반편견교육의 방법에서는 공식적인 교과과정과 비공식적인 교과과정의 조화로운 연계를 통할 때 효과적이라는 점을 언급하면서, 공식적인 교과과정에서는 반편견 주제에 대한 토론학습, 문학 및 영화를 활용한 내러티브 접근, 사연있는 인형활용, 봉사활동 참여 등을 강조하였다. 특히, 편견의 형성 및 감소와 관련하여 초등학생들의 발달적 특성을 잘 파악하여 접근하는 것이 중요하다. 비공식적인 교과과정에서는 반편견에 대한 교사의 모범 및 학교의 반편견을 허용하지 않은 분위기 등이 확립될 필요가 있다는 점을 강조하였다. 초등학교 반편견 교육에서 교사가 차지하는 역할이 매우 중요하기 때문에 교사는 반편견 교육을 함에 있어 자신의 언행이 반편견 극복의 모델이 되도록 해야 한다.
This paper discussed anti-bias education in elementary education. Because of various interchanges among nations, international marriages increase and thereby the number of multi-cultural family children also increases and now those children are experiences various problems such as prejudice, discrimination, group bullying. Unfortunately, many elementary school teachers currently in the classroom report that they feel inadequate to teach multi-cultural or anti-bias curriculum. Especially, in order to resolve prejudice of elementary students and to provide some effective ways of anti-bias education, this study examined the meaning of prejudice, anti-bias, anti-bias education, the important of anti-bias education, and the contents and ways of anti-bias education. In relation to ways of anti-bias education, it is effective that the official subject curriculum and non official curriculum must to be connected harmoniously. In the official subject curriculum, it is useful to utilize the discussion learning about anti-bias subject, the narrative approach using the literature and cinema, role play, service learning. In the non official curriculum, it is necessary to build teacher's modeling on anti-bias attitude and behavior, and school climate of not permitting prejudice. Also this paper emphasized the role of teacher in anti-bias education.

5,500원

14

4,000원

15

연재11. 인간 대상 연구에서의 윤리

이인재

대한피부미용학회 대한피부미용학회지 제12권 제2호 통권 제39호 2014.04 pp.141-146

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

This paper is to examine guidelines and ethics which researchers must know and obey in studies with human subjects. To the end, above all, I reviewed the basic ethical principles of Belmont Report and the purpose and contents of Bioethics Law of Korea launched 2013. 3. And finally I suggested some points which researchers should consider when they draw up research protocols. Any researcher who conducts research with human participants needs to protect the interest of research subjects by complying with relevant codes or regulations. These provisions are designed to ensure that risks to human participants are minimized; that risks are reasonable given the expected benefits; that the participants or their authorized representatives provide informed consent; that the investigator has informed participants of key elements of the study protocol; and that the privacy of participants and the confidentiality of data are maintained. All research involving human participants in Korea also must be reviewed and approved by independent committees known as Institutional Review Boards (IRBs). The IRB is responsible for approving or disapproving all covered research activity, requiring for instance that subjects are given enough information to be able to provide informed consent. The IRB must conduct periodic reviews of research to ensure continued protection of the welfare of human subjects and with compliance with relevant regulations.

4,000원

16

한국 노인일자리사업 현안과 정책과제

이인재

한국사회서비스학회 사회서비스연구 제7권 1호 2017.06 pp.65-88

※ 원문제공기관과의 협약에 따라 개인회원에게 무료로 제공됩니다.

고령자 고용증진은 인구 고령화에 따른 문제점을 해결하는 중요한 정책적 과제이며, 연장된 노후 삶의 질을 높이는 사회참여의 한 방법 특히 활동적 노화의 방법으로서도 중요한 의미를 갖는다. 즉 활동적 노화의 실현을 위해서는 일할 수 있는 기회와 여건을 마련해 주는 것이 바람직하다는 의미에서 고 령자 고용증진은 인구 고령화에 대응하는 핵심적 정책 과제이다. OECD 고령 화정책의 핵심은 “활동적 고령화(active aging)”로 정리된다. 개혁안의 골자 중 하나는 개인의 고용을 촉진하는 것으로 고령자의 노동시장 참여율 증대와 고령 근로자에 대한 취업기회 확대 및 지식과 기술 향상 프로그램 운영을 통 한 고용능력의 증진을 중요한 과제로 제시하고 있다. 우리 사회 역시 고령사 회의 진입을 앞에 두고 국가 경쟁력 강화는 물론이고 우리 사회의 지속적 존 립을 위해서는 노인이 계속해서 일을 할 수 있는 시스템 보완은 중요한 정책 과제로 대두되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 노인빈곤문제 핵심기제로 평가받고 있 는 노인일자리사업의 현안과 정책과제를 살펴보았다. 먼저, 노인일자리사업 현황과 쟁점에서는 노인일자리사업 정체성 확립, 노인일자리사업 참여노인 근로자성 문제 해결, 노인일자리사업 행정지원체계 정립, 노인일자리프로그램 개선과제에 대해 고찰하였다. 민간시장형 노인일자리사업 정책과제로 기업의 60대 인력 수요조사․발굴, 노인인력 적합직종 개발, 노인고용강화 위한 공공과 민간 거버넌스 구축, 노인일자리 지역생태계 구축, 고령자 고용어드바이저제도 신설 등을 살펴보았다.
Promoting employment of the elderly is an important policy task to solve the problems of the aging population. One way of social participation that enhances the quality of life for extended retirement age is also important as a method of active aging. In other words, for the realization of active aging, it is desirable to provide opportunities and conditions to work. Therefore, promotion of employment of the elderly is a key policy task in aging society. The core of the OECD aging policy is “active aging”. One of the goals of the reform proposal is to promote the employment of individuals, thereby increasing the participation rate of the elderly in the labor market, expanding employment opportunities for older workers, and promoting employment capacity through the operation of knowledge and technology improvement programs. In our society, not only strengthening national competitiveness in front of the entrance of an aged society, but also supplementing the system that enables the elderly to continue to work for the continuation of our society is becoming an important policy task. In this study, we examined the issues and policy issues of the elderly employment program, which is evaluated as the key mechanism of the poverty of the elderly. First, in the present situation and issues of the elderly employment, we examined the establishment of the identity of the elderly employment, the settlement of the problem of the elderly workers' participation in the elderly employment, the establishment of the administrative support system for the elderly employment. In the private market type elderly employment policy project, we looked at the demand and investigation of the 60 employees of the company, development of the suitable job for elderly manpower, construction of public and private governance to strengthen the employment of the elderly, construction of employment eco-system.

17

회의진행법

이인재

한국노동조합총연맹 한국노동조합총연맹 교육자료 교육총서 91-1 노동교본 1991.06 pp.89-107

※ 원문제공기관과의 협약에 따라 모든 이용자에게 무료로 제공됩니다.

18

회의진행법

이인재

한국노동조합총연맹 한국노동조합총연맹 교육자료 교육총서 95-2 노동교본 1995.06 pp.101-125

※ 원문제공기관과의 협약에 따라 모든 이용자에게 무료로 제공됩니다.

19

연구진실성과 연구윤리

이인재

한국윤리교육학회 윤리교육연구 제21집 2010.04 pp.269-290

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

연구진실성은 모든 연구자들이 바람직한 연구 활동을 위해 반드시 지켜야할 것으로서, 연구가 윤리적으로 수행되어야 할 뿐만 아니라 그 연구에 대해 연구자, 연구 결과의 소비자, 그리고 일반인 모두가 믿을 수 있도록 계획되어 진행되고 그 결과가 발표되어야 함을 요청한다. 그렇다면 우리는 어떻게 우리의 연구 계획이나 과정 그리고 그 결과를 객관적으로 타당하게 하며 믿을 수 있도록 할 것인가? 이는 바로 연구 활동에서의 진실성을 확보하는 문제와 직결되는 것으로, 연구자는 연구진실성의 확보를 위해 무엇을 어떻게 해야 하는가?에 대해 숙고할 필요가 있다. 본 연구에서는 연구를 수행하는 전 과정에서 연구자가 추구해야 할 목표 내지 가치를 드러내는 연구진실성이 구체적으로 무엇인지를 연구진실성과 대조되는 연구의 두 가지 스팩트럼인 연구부정행위와 의심스런 연구수행과 비교하여 살펴보았으며, 연구진실성을 침해하는 대표적인 연구부정행위인 표절과 중복게재의 개념, 유형, 문제점을 살펴봄으로써 연구진실성의 특성과 중요성을 숙고해 보았다. 또한 연구진실성을 확보하기 위한 한 방안으로서 연구진실성 위반의 전형적 사례에 해당하는 표절과 중복게재의 문제를 해결 방안과 관련지어, 인용하는 저작물에 대하여 출처표시를 정확하게 할 것과 투고 논문에 대한 동료 심사 제도를 강화하는 방안을 강조하였다.
The main aim of this paper is to be understood what is the research integrity , what is the relationship to the research ethics. Research integrity is defined it as that all researchers should obey in doing desirable research activities. It is not to be confused with research ethics. These two terms share some commonality, yet the main difference lies in substance. Research ethics usually pertains to issues related to the decisions about, or treatment practice of, humans in research. But research integrity deals with the question of truth and honesty in science, as well as complying with commonly accepted research practices beholden to the research community. I examined also the concept and problems of the plagiarism and the redundant publication as the representative type of the research misconduct, suggested the right way of citation and peer review as effective approaches to overcome them. To avoid the deliberate or undeliberate attempt to plagiarize and self-plagiarize, researchers should use proper amount of quotations, which means other's work should be cited when it used and their work should not be filled with quotations. If one uses too many quotations or does not give credit in accordance with the accepted fair practices of the relevant research community in their creative work written on the basis of their own or another's work, this constitutes plagiarism. I also stressed the importance of the right citation because the citation, I thought, was one of effective ways to avoid the plagiarism.

5,800원

20

연재5. 올바른 저자 표시와 동료 심사

이인재

대한피부미용학회 대한피부미용학회지 제11권 제2호 통권 제34호 2013.04 pp.195-202

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

The purpose of this paper is to explore authorship and peer review that we are able to catch a glimpse of one side of the rights and duties of researchers. First, it was examined what is ethics to be observed in general when researchers would present research results, and then, the meaning of authorship, the conditions and criteria of author, the order of author, improper authorships, and the criteria of acknowledgement when the research results were announced. Second, with regard to the other important role of the researchers, I searched concept and significance of peer review, and discussed the reviewer’s ethics when the researchers would examine papers submitted to journals and research proposals. Through research activities, the researchers may also become the author of the results of their research and sometimes review the research proposal and research results of other researchers as a peer reviewer. To be included as an authentic author on a paper, it is necessary to have made a substantial and new contribution essential to publication of paper, to provide a good faith contribution to writing and/or editing of manuscripts, and to approve the content of the version submitted for publication. Contribution to the publication of a manuscript that do not meet the criteria for authorship should be recognized in the acknowledgements section of the paper. If a paper has more than one author, and assuming all authors meet the "criteria for authorship", then the first author will typically be the person who wrote the first draft of the manuscript, the last author will be the head of research group, and authors listed in between will be listed in order of decreasing contributions to the projects. A reviewer or referee of a manuscripts should judge objectively the quality of the complete manuscript and the supporting information, including the experimental and theoretical data, the interpretations and exposition, with due regard to the maintenance of high scientific and literary standards. And a reviewer should respect the intellectual independence of the authors.

4,000원

 
1 2 3 4 5
페이지 저장