Earticle

Data mining techniques develop a more accurate classification algorithm for patients classified as either normotensive, prehypertensive, or hypertensive. Logistic Model Tree, NBTree, and Bagging were chosen as the three classification models with tenfold cross-validation (LMT). Over 24 hours, we collected ABP readings from 1161 patients. To analyze the data, data mining techniques were used and a tool called WEKA. The data was analyzed based on age, gender, wake-up blood pressure, medication, sleep-up blood pressure, and overall blood pressure. According to bagging results, 886 cases (76.3 percent) are correctly classified, with 270 cases classified as pre-hypertensive, 436 cases as Normotensive, and 180 cases as hypertensive. NBTree's results show that 882 (75.9%) of the 1161 instances are correctly classified. Pre-hypertensive patients make up 256, normotensive patients 442, and hypertensive patients 184. Of the 1161 instances, the LMT algorithm correctly classified 878 (75.6 percent). According to the results, 275 people are pre-hypertensive, 431 are normotensive, and 172 are hypertensive. According to our findings, bagging is the most accurate classifier for the 24 hour ABP Monitoring dataset we used. Bagging achieves less overfitting because it focuses on global accuracy. It stabilizes and improves the accuracy of unstable methods compared to single classifiers.

본 연구에서는 기계학습 기법의 한 갈래인 로지스틱 회귀모형과 의사결정나무 모형을 이용하여 인공위성 영상에서 Cochlodinium polykrikoides 적조 픽셀을 탐지하는 방법을 제안한다. 학습자료로 적조, 청수, 탁수해역에서 추출된 수출광량 분광 프로파일(918개)을 활용하였다. 전체 데이터셋의 70%를 추출하여 모형 학습에 활용하였으며, 나머지 30%를 이용하여 모형의 분류 정확도를 평가하였다. 정확도 평가 결과 로지스틱 회귀모형은 약 97%의 분류 정확도를 보였으며, 의사결정나무 모형은 약 86%의 분류 정확도를 보였다.

This study propose a new method to detect Cochlodinium polykrikoides on satellite images using logistic regression and decision tree. We used spectral profiles(918) extracted from red tide, clear water and turbid water as training data. The 70% of the entire data set was extracted and used for model training, and the classification accuracy of the model was evaluated by using the remaining 30%. As a result of the accuracy evaluation, the logistic regression model showed about 97% classification accuracy, and the decision tree model showed about 86% classification accuracy.