Earticle

연구목적: 생성형 AI를 활용하여 현장지휘관에게 매뉴얼·지침 등 전문 지식을 요약하여 제공하는 프로그램을 개발하고자 하였다. 연구방법: 현장지휘관 심층 인터뷰를 통해 의사결정 장애요인과 문제점 을 분석하고, 관련 매뉴얼·지침을 학습한 프로그램을 통해 가상 시나리오 답변을 제공하여 소방공무 원 대상 설문조사를 실시하여 현장 적용 가능성을 검증하였다. 연구결과: 가상 시나리오 분석 결과, AI 기반 의사결정 지원 프로그램은 현장지휘관에게 핵심 정보를 신속·정확하게 제공하여 의사결정 속도 와 정확성을 높이는 효과가 있음을 확인하였다. 결론: 본 연구는 생성형 AI가 매뉴얼 기반 현장지휘 체계의 한계를 보완하고, 전문성 강화, 의사결정 일관성 확보, 인명 및 재산 피해 경감에 기여할 수 있는 가능성을 제시하였다.

Purpose: Using generative AI, we tried to develop a program that summarizes and provides expertise such as manuals and instructions to field commanders. Method: Through in-depth interviews with field commanders, decision-making obstacles and problems were analyzed, and virtual scenario answers were provided through programs that learned related manuals and guidelines to verify the applicability of the field by conducting a survey for firefighters. Result: As a result of virtual scenario analysis, it was confirmed that the AI-based decision support program has the effect of increasing the speed and accuracy of decision-making by providing key information to field commanders quickly and accurately. Conclusion: This study suggested the possibility that the Generative AI can supplement the limitations of the manual-based system, strengthen field command expertise, ensure consistency in decision-making, and contribute to the reduction of human and property damage.

The Field Commander system(行營兵馬使制) of the Goryeo dynasty was devised to effectively execute military operations against intrusions by other polities, disturbances by rioters especially in its northern area, Yang gye(兩界) province. This system officially appeared in 1047 with the representative title, Field Commander(行營兵馬使), which was originally called Daebeon Byeongma(大番兵馬), and soon changed to Haeng-yeong Dotongsa(行營都統使), to Haeng-yeong Byeongma Dotongsa(行營兵馬都統使). Since the title, Haeng-yeong Dotongsa appeared in the historical records first as early as in 1010 among above mentioned names, we could assume that the Field Commander system was instituted in no later than 995. It was a temporal role which could be dismissed once the mission had been cleared as Haeng-yeong(行營) of Haeng-yeong Dotongsa carries sense of temporal. The highest post of the Field Commander system was a Supervisor of Field Commanders(判行營兵馬事) which was usually assigned to the Grand Councillors(宰臣). The following posts were：Field Commanders(行營兵馬使) which were usually assigned to the Junior Councillors(樞密) or the officials of the third rank(職事3品官), Manager of Field Operation(知行營兵馬事) assigned to the third ranks, Vice Field Commander(行營兵馬副使) assigned to the third or fourth ranks, Controller of the Field Office(行營兵馬判官) assigned to the sixth or seventh ranks, and the Administrative Officer of the Field Office(行營兵馬錄事) for the officials on probation. A post, Director of the Field Office(行營兵馬別監), also appeared in the beginning of the twelfth century. This Field Commander system shares the same structure as well as the same functions with the Commander system(兵馬使制). The only difference was that the Commander Office for the Commander system was a regular institution of the dynasty unlike the Field Commander Office that was instituted on occasion. The main goal of each office pursued was to execute operations successfully by commanding military units. It was highly possible that their goals might have collided with each other. The Goryeo court, however, managed to harmonized the two systems by appointing officials for one office for a single occasion between the two systems. Or, sometimes one official had been appointed as a Supervisor of commanders with the duty of the Field Commander；sometimes appointed as a Commander and a Field Commander at the same time. Then, why the Goryeo court maintained the two similar systems? The two systems worked on the base of 'checks and balances'；the two commander systems operated collaboratively while they restrained each other's power going excessive. Moreover, the Goryeo court also instituted the Commander in Chief(都兵馬使) which took charge of general military affairs. After all, the military authority of the Yang gye province, the northern border area of the dynasty, was controlled by three major commanderships.

This paper examines the Arab mujahidin commander known as Khattab and his role in the Chechen resistence to Russia. After the desultory war, Russia failed to subordinate the Chechens to herself. The Chechens continued to resist aided by volunteers from other Islamic lands who want to impose a more militant, fundamentalist Islam on the Muslims of the Caucasus. The first Chechen war radicalized much of the population and eventually resulted in the legalization of fundamentalist groups represented by the “Djamaat” battalion. This move was facilitated by foreign involvement in the person of a Chechen-Jordanian Fathi. As a result of Fathi's influence, Khattab and other veterans of the Afghanistan war were enlisted for combat service in Chechnya. Khattab fighted the Soviet army in Afghanistan and took part in wars fought in mainly Muslim parts of the former Soviet Union. During the First Chechen War, his units participated in fighting Russian infidels and were credited with several devastating ambushes on Russian columns in the Chechen mountains. After the conclusion of war, Khattab also founded several training camps for Islamic fighters along the lines of camps in Afghanistan. The Russian government has accused Khattab of links with Usama Bin Ladin. Dagestan was ideal for Khattab’s goal of creating a pan-Caucasian Islamic state because of the strong ties with Wahhabis. Although the Wahhabi enthusiasm for the Dagestani invasion ended in failure and Khattab was killed by Russian security forces, the subject, so-called Islamic mujahideen network in Chechnya, demands further investigation.