The theory about the standard of medical action become popular, however, the background and the applicability about this theory still lacks enough analysis. Based on the interaction between precedent and doctrine, this theory in Japan has experienced a process from the standard in medicine and the absolute standard to the relative standard of medical action. If the judgment of medical action is based on the standard of medical action, it will not only provide the prescriptive judgment standard, but also provide the guide to action for medical. Under the background of China, this theory should be applicable too. When we apply this theory, we shouldn’t embrace the standard in medicine, but the relative standard of medical action. Specifically, the particularity of hospital, the difference of area, the difference of doctor’s field,the currency of medical knowledge and the urgency of medical action should be taken into consideration, and so on. The order of priority of medical customs should be dismissed from the standard of medical action. The standard of medical action should be a prescriptive standard, and the difference between the standard of medical action and the medical consultation from processional. And we should also pay enough attention to the limit of this theory.
중국법에 대한 학술적 연구발표 및 회원 상호간의 교류를 목적으로 하며, 그 목적을 달성하기 위하여 다음 각 호의 사업을 한다.
1. 중국 법학 및 이와 밀접한 관련을 가지는 인접 학문분야에 대한 조사 연구
2. 연구발표회 및 토론회의 개최
3. 학회지 및 연구서적의 간행
4. 기타 필요하다고 인정되는 사업