Earticle

초록

영어

The Purpose of this paper is to reveal the identity of 4Q246, Daiel Apocryphon through the literary comparison with Daiel 7. and to read the theology of Qumran community transcribed in the scroll, 4Q246. After 4Q246 was presented by J. T. Milik in a lecture given at Harvard University in 1972 and was made known by J. A. Fitzmyer in his study, this scroll has made a big issues for a long time being. The main question of 4Q246(Aramaic Apocalypse) is the identity of the designated "Son of God." We can have two views of that, a positive figure or a negative figure. J. T. Milik insists that the "Son of God" refers to a Seleucid king, referring Antiochus IV Epiphanes. Florentino Garcia Martinez suggests that it is an angelic savior like Michael, Melchizedek, and the Prince of Light. And other scholars view the figure as a messianic redeemer who will cast God's enemies away and build the kingdom of God's people (Cross, Collins, Hengel, Kuhn). Exceptionally, David Flusser insists that he is the Antichrist, and Martin Hengel insists that he is the Jewish people collectively. E. Puech believes that the Son of the Most High could be either the future Davidic Messiah or a historical Seleucid pretender. Joseph A. Fitzmyer argues that what the Son of God refers is not a messiah, but a coming Jewish ruler, perhaps a member of the Hasmonean dynasty. According to the scholars, therefore, the title "Son of God" would be either a historical character, a heavenly figure or a messianic human being. But, most importantly, it should be noticed that they in fact have not seen the text itself; for example its structure, feature, theme than the vague figure in scroll. With literary criticism and historical view, we have to review the text of this scroll. Through its methodology, we can find the structure, feature, terminolo- gy similar to the book of Daniel, expecially Ch. 7. Martin Hengel suggests that the figure is similar to "the one like a Son of Man" in Daniel 7: 13-14. Furthermore two texts that have same apocalyptic structure and feature seem to say that the author of 4Q246 was influenced by Daniel 7. The two texts reveal such an extensive degree of verbal, thematic, and structural correspondences. Therefore we can conclude that 4Q246 is the Apocryphon of Daniel, but the debate about the identity of son of God in 4Q246 is still valid. And Qumran community wants to read their hope, coming redeemer saving the people, the qumran theology, habits, and beliefs in this scroll.

한국어

4Q246과 다니엘 7장의 상관관계에 관한 연구 4Q26은 1972년 밀리크(J. T. Milik)에 의해 학계에 공개된 이후, 기독교적 배경에 대한 논의가 적극적으로 이루어졌으나, 본 논문에서 역사적이며 문학적인 논의를 중심으로 4Q246이 가진 정체성의 탐구, 특히 다니엘서 7장과의 연계성, 하나님의 아들의 정체성, 그리고 쿰란신학과의 관계성을 논할 것이다.

목차

1. 들어가는 말
 2. 4Q246 본문
 3. 4Q246 본문 분석
 4. 다니엘서 7장과 4Q246
 6. 결론
 7. 참고 문헌

키워드

저자

• 조명기 [ Myung-Ki Cho, Ph. D. | 백석대 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  구약논단 [The Korean Journal of Old Testament Studies]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1229-0521

• 수록기간

  1995~2019

• 십진분류

  KDC 233 DDC 220