Earticle

초록

영어

In recent years, with the reform of corporate law around the world, mainly calling for reducing control and enforcing corporate self-governing, it presents the trend of a conversion from formerly prior regulations to subsequent regulations. So the judicial litigation mechanism comes to show
its importance. No matter whether corporate legislation or corporate practice is concerned, the function of corporate action is more and more emphasized.
On the basis of provisions on corporate actionin corporate laws of both China and Korea, this paper is to review and compare the categories and features concerning corporate action of both in full scale, and concentrate on discussing and comparing the actions of shareholder meeting’s defective resolutions, so as to find out the features and deficiencies in the legal systems of both countries, thus attempting to supply helpful experience on how to improve the legal system of corporate action in China.
Apparently, relevant provisions in corporate law of Korea are more developed, which reflects Korean legislators’ attention to judicial remedies for corporate disputes. Comparatively, though the availability of litigation is increased under amendments of corporate law in 2005, relevant provisions in the corporate law of China is still obviously insufficient, which greatly
requires improvements through judicial interpretations or other methods to meet the needs of judicial practice. The establishment and judicial experience of corporate action system of Korea are undoubtedly more advanced than that of China. While both the legal system and methods of interpretations are very similar between Korea and China, legislative experience and cases in Korea is deemed to be of high significance to China as references.

중국어

近年来，随着各国公司法改革纷纷倡导放松管制、加强公司自治，体现出由原先的事前规制转向事后规制的特点，公司法上的司法诉讼机制显得非常重要，不论是公司立法，还是公司实践，越来越关注公
司诉讼的作用。本文以中国和韩国公司法上关于公司诉讼的规定为基础，全面考察比较两国公司法上公司诉讼的种类及特色，并着重探讨与比较股东大会决议瑕疵之诉，以期找出两国公司诉讼法律制度的特点及
不足，并为完善我国的公司诉讼法律制度借鉴有益的经验。
显然，韩国公司法的相关规定比较完善，显示出韩国立法者对公司纠纷的司法救济的关注。相比之下，尽管2005年新公司法的可诉性得到加强，但是，中国公司法的相关规定还是明显不足，急需通过司法解释
等手段进行完善，以满足司法实践之需求。韩国在公司诉讼制度的建设及审判经验的积累方面无疑走在中国的前面，且韩国的法律体系与中国非常相似，解释的方法也较相近，因此，韩国的立法经验和判例对中国具有很大的借鉴意义。

목차

摘要
 一．绪论
  (一) 公司诉讼概念的界定
  (二) 公司诉讼的法律意义
  (三) 中韩公司诉讼的立法现状
 二．中韩公司法上公司诉讼的种类
  (一) 对所有公司共同适用的诉讼
  (二) 人合公司特有的诉讼
  (三) 资合公司特有的诉讼
 三．中韩公司法上公司诉讼的特色
  (一) 诉的性质
  (二) 起诉权人的限制
  (三) 诉的程序
  (四) 判决的效力
 四．中韩公司法上股东大会决议瑕疵诉讼之比较
  (一) 诉的类型
  (二) 诉的原因
  (三) 诉的性质
  (四) 提诉权人
  (五) 提诉期间
  (六) 程序
  (七) 判决的效力
 五．结论
 参考文献
 Abstract

키워드

중국 중국법 중국회사법 회사법 회사소송 주주총회하자소송 한중비교 公司法底公司诉讼底股东大会瑕疵诉讼底中韩比较 공사법저공사소송저고동대회하자소송저중한비교 corporate law corporate action actions of shareholder meeting’s defectiveresolutions comparison between China and Korea

저자

• 吳日煥 [ 오일환 | 中国政法大学民商经济法学院副教授 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물