Earticle

현재 위치 Home

New Paradigm and its Policy Framework in Decision-making on Large Dams

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    한국습지학회 바로가기
  • 간행물
    한국습지학회지 바로가기
  • 통권
    제8권 제1호 (2006.03)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.97-106
  • 저자
    박성제
  • 언어
    영어(ENG)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A52579

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

4,000원

원문정보

초록

영어
This study discusses two canceled dam projects, Youngwol Dam in South Korea and Two Forks Dam in Colorado of the United States. Both of them illustrate how the new paradigm applies to regional water projects because they became victims of environmental opposition in the new paradigm. While the cases have no apparent close relationships and they occurred in different decades, they offer interesting comparisons. They were basically struggles between water development coalitions and environmental protection coalitions on regional water conflicts. The two proposed projects brought about fierce debates on large dam as they embraced a wide-range of environmental, social, and political issues rather than construction of dams themselves. Huge anti-dam oppositions scrapped them at the cost of nearly ten years for decision-makings and enormous financial resources for feasibility studies respectively. It identifies who the policy actors were, what the policy strategies were, and how the water policies evolved in both countries. The decision-makings on the two projects appeared at first glance to be made under formal institutional frameworks, but in actuality, they relied significantly on decisions of the two important political actors. The Korean society began to learn negotiation and cooperation approaches to solve the water conflict by establishing the Joint Task Force Team on Youngwol project in 1999. The team is recognized as a new conflict resolution method in South Korea because a diverse of stakeholder interests voluntarily participated in the decision-making process and discussed water issues directly. Even though the projects resulted in futile fruits in each country, they illustrate the images of the new paradigm that significantly affected in formulating regional water policies in South Korea and the United States.

목차

Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 2. STRUCTURE OF CONFLICT
 3. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
  3.1 POLICY ACTORS
  3.2 POLICY STRATEGIES
  3.3 POLICY PROCESSES
 4. CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES

키워드

new paradigm large dam water policy water conflict policy change policy process Youngwol Dam Two Forks Dam South Korea United States

저자

  • 박성제 [ Sungje Park | 미래수자원환경연구소 소장 ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    한국습지학회 [Korean Wetlands Society]
  • 설립연도
    1999
  • 분야
    자연과학>기타자연과학
  • 소개
    습지보전에 관한 특성 및 이용현황을 파악하여 습지의 보전과 개발의 조화방안을 조사 및 연구하고 람사협약 등 국제협력에 동참하여 습지보전에 기여함

간행물

  • 간행물명
    한국습지학회지 [韓國濕地學會誌]
  • 간기
    계간
  • pISSN
    1229-6031
  • eISSN
    2384-0056
  • 수록기간
    1999~2026
  • 등재여부
    KCI 등재
  • 십진분류
    KDC 472 DDC 570

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 한국습지학회지 제8권 제1호

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장