Earticle

초록

영어

A number of political theorists in recent years have promoted the concept of modern democracy as an alternative to an interest-based democracy or aggregative democracy. Concerning a discussion about democracy, such as 'difference', 'disagreement', 'inclusion' have emerged as the important concepts. So the discussion of modern democracy should begin with reflection on modern reason. The most important issues here are the concepts of identification, recognition, minority, and difference. In the middle of these debates, locates Habermas's communicative action theory which bases on 'discussion' and 'deliberation'. The transformation from 'subject paradigm' to 'communicative paradigm' produces a basis on modern democracy debate. Because, first, communicative paradigm relies on 'the Other'. Second, the subject's transformation has relation to power.This paper aims to criticize is the first half of this article will be to criticize radical post-modern tendency. The other half will be reconstruct rightness of modern democracy. The validity of modern democracy differs from 'dividing' democracy, or 'disorganizing' democracy. The Divided society or the disorganized society, that is to say, the post-modern democracy doesn't make an alternative to our future society.

목차

Ⅰ. 서 론
 Ⅱ. 근대적 법의 정당성
  1. 근대적 법의 이원적 전환
  2. 근대적 법의 정당성
 Ⅲ. 소통적 권력과 절차로서의 주권
  1. 법과 권력, 그리고 소통적 권력
  2. 인민주권의 탈실체화
 Ⅳ. 입헌적 공론 영역의 확장과 ‘차이’의 문제
  1. 공론영역 확장의 정치
  2. 차이의 포용 정치
 Ⅴ. 결 론
 참고문헌
 Abstract

저자

• 백경남 [ Kyung-Nam Paik | 동국대학교 정치외교학과 교수 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  한독사회과학논총 [Zeitschrift der Koreanisch-Deutschen Gesellschaft für Sozialwissenschaften]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1229-537X

• 수록기간

  1991~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 305 DDC 300