This study examines the artistic career of Jeong Mal-jo (1907?1977), a Korean Nihonga painter born in colonial Korea and raised in Kyoto, from the perspective of the “boundary” between Japan and Korea. Jeong studied at the Kyoto City School of Arts and Crafts and the Kyoto City Specialist School of Painting. He later joined Shokosha, a private painting school led by Nishiyama Suisho, and developed as a Nihonga painter within the Kyoto art world. At the same time, he consistently depicted Korean people and customs. Because Jeong had lived in Japan since childhood, the Korea represented in his works cannot simply be regarded as a record of his native environment. He visited Korea intermittently to sketch its people and customs and reconstructed these subjects through the techniques of Nihonga acquired in Kyoto. His choice of Korean subject matter may have served as a means of engaging with his origins and distinguishing himself from Japanese painters. However, his representations were also shaped by the institutional framework and critical discourse of the Japanese art world.
Contemporary critics described Jeong’s works using such expressions as “local atmosphere,” “the smell of the soil,” and “the characteristics of a person from the peninsula.” Kanzaki Kenichi compared Jeong with the Taiwanese painter Chen Chin, praising both for mastering Nihonga techniques while expressing distinctive local sentiments. This reveals the contradictory expectations imposed upon colonial artists: they were required to follow the technical standards of Nihonga while displaying cultural differences through their subject matter. Jeong’s position became more complex during the Asia-Pacific War. As a member of Shokosha, he participated in exhibitions associated with saikan hokoku, or “serving the nation through painting.” His 1943 work Yamato-gokoro combined symbols of Japan with the figures of a Korean man and woman. This work demonstrates how his representation of Korean figures intersected with wartime imperial ideology.
For Jeong, the “boundary” was not a neutral position between two cultures, but a site where multiple and contradictory affiliations coexisted. His career reveals how imperial Nihonga incorporated colonial artists while simultaneously defining and differentiating them according to their colonial origins.
동북아시아문화학회 [The Association of North-east Asian Cultures]
설립연도
2000
분야
복합학>학제간연구
소개
동북아시아 문화의 다양성과 정체성을 연구 토론하고, 지역내 문화 교류의 다양한 모습을 연구하고 문화변동의 큰 틀을 집적함으로써 우리 민족 문화 및 상대 민족의 문화적 터전을 이해하여 문화공동체적 특성을 계발하고 상호 관련성의 강화를 유도하는 학술활동을 통해 동북아시아의 문화발전에 이바지함.