Earticle

현재 위치 Home

Article

Processing Instruction, Syntactic Priming, or Both? Comparing the Effects of Single and Combined Interventions on Japanese EFL Learners’ Object Relative Clause Processing

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    아시아영어교육학회 바로가기
  • 간행물
    The Journal of AsiaTEFL SCOPUS KCI 등재 바로가기
  • 통권
    Vol.23 No.3 (2026.09)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.778-792
  • 저자
    Ta Na
  • 언어
    영어(ENG)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A492233

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

4,800원

원문정보

초록

영어
This study investigated the separate and combined effects of processing instruction (PI), which focuses on input-based explicit rules, and syntactic priming (SP), which focuses on output-based implicit learning through repetition, on object relative clauses (ORCs) in the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classroom in Japan. Participants comprised 71 Japanese EFL learners from a technical college, randomly assigned to four groups (PI, SP, PI+SP, and control). All groups undertook a pre-test, intervention session, immediate post-test, and delayed post-test. The three intervention groups received ORC instruction, whereas the control group did not. In each test, participants processed 24 sentences and answered comprehension questions. Accuracy and reading times were compared across groups and clause types. The findings demonstrated that instruction groups improved in both comprehension accuracy and reading speed after the intervention compared with control group, and these gains lasted for four weeks. However, no significant differences were observed among the three intervention groups. These findings highlighted that since the combination of PI and SP did not outperform the isolated approaches, teachers may choose either based on instructional feasibility.
기타언어
Энэхүү судалгаагаар Японы Англи хэлний Гадаад хэл (EFL) ангид тодорхой дүрмүүдэд анхаарлаа хандуулдаг боловсруулалтын заавар (PI) болон давталтаар дамжин далд суралцахад анхаарлаа хандуулдаг синтаксик прайминг (SP)-ийн тусдаа болон хосолсон нөлөөллийг судалсан. Оролцогчид нь техникийн коллежийн 71 Японы EFL суралцагчдаас бүрдэж, санамсаргүй байдлаар дөрвөн бүлэгт (PI, SP, PI+SP, болон хяналтын бүлэг) хуваарилагдсан. Бүх бүлгүүд урьдчилсан шалгалт, интервенцийн хичээл, шууд дараах шалгалт, хойшлуулсан дараах шалгалтыг хийсэн. Гурван интервенцийн бүлэг ORC зааварчилгаа авсан бол хяналтын бүлэгт заагаагүй. Тест бүрт оролцогчид 24 өгүүлбэр боловсруулж, ойлголтын асуултанд хариулсан. Нарийвчлал болон унших хугацааг бүлгүүд болон өгүүлбэрийн төрлүүдээр харьцуулсан. Судалгааны үр дүнгээс харахад хяналтын бүлэгтэй харьцуулахад интервенцийн дараа ойлголтын нарийвчлал болон унших хурд хоёулаа сайжирсан бөгөөд эдгээр өсөлт дөрвөн долоо хоног үргэлжилсэн. Гэсэн хэдий ч гурван интервенцийн бүлгийн хооронд мэдэгдэхүйц ялгаа ажиглагдаагүй. Эдгээр үр дүнгээс харахад PI болон SP-ийн хослол нь тусгаарлагдсан аргуудаас давж гараагүй тул багш нар сургалтын хэрэгжих боломжид үндэслэн аль нэгийг нь сонгож болно гэдгийг онцолсон.

목차

Abstract
Introduction
Literature Review
Processing Difficulty of ORCs
Interventional Approaches
The Present Study
Methods
Participants
Materials
Procedure
Data Analysis
Results
Accuracy in the Comprehension Test
Reading Times (RTs) From the Self-paced Reading Task
Discussion
Do the Three Instructional Treatments (PI, SP, and PI+SP) Differentially Affect L2 Learners’ ORC Comprehension Accuracy?
Do the Three Instructional Treatments (PI, SP, and PI+SP) Differentially Affect L2 Learners’ ORC Processing Speed (Reading Times)?
Conclusion
The Author
References

저자

  • Ta Na [ National Institute of Technology, Numazu College ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    아시아영어교육학회 [Asia TEFL]
  • 설립연도
    2004
  • 분야
    사회과학>교육학
  • 소개
    The goals of Asia TEFL are to promote scholarship, disseminate information, and facilitate cross-cultural understanding among persons concerned with the teaching and learning of English in Asia. In order to accomplish this, Asia TEFL will pursue the following goals: 1. To link ELT professionals in joint research on issues and concerns regarding English teaching and learning in the Asian context. 2. To publish an academic journal, The Asia TEFL Journal, as an internationally recognized journal in the field of English language teaching. 3. To host conferences and seminars addressing important issues concerning ELT in Asia. 4. To develop proficiency guidelines and assessment methods designed for the needs of the Asian context. 5. To develop programs for Asian learners and teachers of English to build their English language proficiency and cultural understanding and provide them with the skills required to be efficient English teaching professionals.

간행물

  • 간행물명
    The Journal of AsiaTEFL
  • 간기
    계간
  • pISSN
    1738-3102
  • eISSN
    2466-1511
  • 수록기간
    2004~2026
  • 등재여부
    SCOPUS,KCI 등재
  • 십진분류
    KDC 740 DDC 420

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / The Journal of AsiaTEFL Vol.23 No.3

    피인용수 : 0건 (자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장