This paper examines the shift toward an economic-security and national-strategy nexus in international relations through the case of South Korea’s semiconductor industry in the age of artificial intelligence. It develops the concept of techno-economic statecraft to explain how states convert technology, supply chains, market access, and institutional rules into strategic leverage. Using process tracing and a qualitative single-case analysis informed by weaponized interdependence, informal economic sanctions, economic statecraft, and strategic hedging, the paper follows the sequence from structural vulnerability in the THAAD dispute and Japan’s export controls to AI-driven HBM demand, U.S.–China technology competition, South Korea’s industrial-diplomatic response, and China’s counter-response. It argues that South Korea attempts to transform structural dependence into strategic indispensability through industrial upgrading, domestic institutional support, alliance management, and multilateral cooperation. Building a three‑layer analytical framework combining structural network conditions, state instrumental capacity and middle‑power behavioural posture, the paper further distinguishes techno‑economic statecraft from related concepts to clarify its unique causal conversion logic. The findings suggest that middle‑power conditional autonomy is not equivalent to neutrality, but hinges on the effective utilisation of irreplaceable supply‑chain nodes amid great‑power rivalry. The case shows that global technology networks provide great powers with chokepoint power, but also that middle powers can preserve limited and conditional autonomy when they occupy indispensable nodes in critical supply chains.
목차
ABSTRACT I. Research Topic and Research Background II. Literature Review, Research Questions, and Theoretical Framework 1. Literature Review 2. Research Questions and Method 3. Theoretical Framework III. Case Analysis 1. Structural Vulnerability: THAAD, Japanese Export Controls, and Weaponized Interdependence 2. HBM, Network Compression, and U.S.–China Techno-Economic Statecraft IV. From Structural Dependence to Strategic Indispensability: Linking Theory and Cases V. Research Conclusion: Findings and Implications References
'KU 중국연구원'은 건국대학교만의 차별화된 가치를 구현하기 위해 건국대의 교시(校是)인 성(誠)·신(信)·의(義)를 바탕으로 인본(人本)·소통(疏通)·통섭(統攝)에 초점을 둔 중국학 연구를 지향하고 있습니다. 또한 시대적 당위성을 반영한 실용 중심의 연구와 학문 후속세대 양성에 기여하는 국제적 연구센터로 발돋음하는 연구기관 입니다.