Objectives: We examined how institutional and service factors relate to inpatient satisfaction. Methods: Using 2022 Korea Health Panel data (v2.2), we analyzed 2,584 hospitalized adults (≥19). Six satisfaction dimensions (5-point; higher = lower) were compared by gender, institutional type, treatment type, and perceived overtreatment via t-tests (SPSS 18; Cronbach's α = .914; p < .05). Results: Satisfaction did not differ by gender. Public hospitals showed lower satisfaction in four dimensions (p < .05). Surgical/procedural patients showed lower satisfaction in five of six dimensions (p < .001) but higher with physician selection. Patients perceiving overtreatment showed lower satisfaction in all six dimensions (p < .05). Conclusions: Process aspects—explanation adequacy and treatment appropriateness—mattered more than sociodemographic traits. Hospitals should strengthen communication and shared decision-making; quality assessment should weight patient-experience indicators.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론 Ⅱ. 연구방법 1. 연구모형 및 가설 2. 자료 및 변수 3. 분석방법 Ⅲ. 연구결과 1. 조사대상자의 일반적 특성 2. 성별에 따른 환자 만족도 비교 3. 국공립 여부에 따른 환자 만족도 비교 4. 입원치료내용에 따른 환자 만족도 비교 5. 과잉진료 인식에 따른 환자 만족도 비교 Ⅳ. 고찰 Ⅴ. 결론 REFERENCES