정치체제와 시민사회 자율성이 AI 매개 시민참여에 미치는 영향:한국, 일본, 중국의 유사체계 비교연구
Political Regimes, Civil Society Autonomy, and the Depth of AI Mediated Civic Participation: A Most Similar Systems Comparison of South Korea, Japan, and China
This study examines how AI mediated civic participation has been institutionalised across three Northeast Asian states, South Korea, Japan, and China and how their distinct political institutional contexts shape these patterns. Despite shared developmental state legacies, Confucian cultural heritage, and world class digital infrastructure, the three countries display strikingly divergent trajectories of AI enabled participation in terms of depth and citizen autonomy.
Adopting a Most Similar Systems Design (MSSD), we triangulate evidence from the UN E Government Development Index (EGDI), Oxford Government AI Readiness Index (GARI), Stanford AI Index 2025, Freedom House's Freedom on the Net, the V Dem Digital Society Project, and operational statistics of national civic participation platforms. Findings show that South Korea?world leading in EGDI (0.957, 3rd in 2024) and 3rd in GARI (79.98)?nevertheless suffers from bureaucracy led top down platform design that constrains substantive feedback loops. Japan, despite ranking first in the E Participation Index (2022), exhibits institutional friction between consensus oriented nemawashi culture and the Digital Agency's post 2021 reforms. China combines massive throughput (Beijing's 12345 hotline processed 24,195,000 cases in 2024 with 95%+ satisfaction) with extreme online freedom restriction (FOTN 9/100), embodying a controlled responsiveness logic.
These divergences are not driven by technological capacity alone but by how developmental state administrative legacies, regime openness, and civil society autonomy structurally configure AI deployment. We argue that all three states share the common tension between ‘formal expansion’ and ‘substantive autonomy constraint’ of participation, and propose two governance principles?algorithmic transparency and accountability linkage as a minimum shared baseline.
동북아시아문화학회 [The Association of North-east Asian Cultures]
설립연도
2000
분야
복합학>학제간연구
소개
동북아시아 문화의 다양성과 정체성을 연구 토론하고, 지역내 문화 교류의 다양한 모습을 연구하고 문화변동의 큰 틀을 집적함으로써 우리 민족 문화 및 상대 민족의 문화적 터전을 이해하여 문화공동체적 특성을 계발하고 상호 관련성의 강화를 유도하는 학술활동을 통해 동북아시아의 문화발전에 이바지함.