This study scrutinizes the efficacy of two fundamental service recovery strategies—apology and compensation—and their combined application as influences on the customer evaluation process in an online apparel retail setting. The investigation aims to contribute novel insights into the comparative effects of these strategies on customer perception of justice, emotions, and post-recovery satisfaction. Data from a scenario-based experimental survey method were analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), analysis of variance (ANOVA), and structural equation modeling (SEM). Findings indicated customers perceived more substantial distributive and interactional justice when offered an apology. Apologies evoked higher positive emotions than compensation alone. Distributive justice emerged as the most influential factor in shaping post-recovery satisfaction across all service recovery strategies. Positive emotions had a significant impact on post-recovery satisfaction, highlighting the importance of addressing affective responses in service recovery strategies. These findings challenge traditional views in the service recovery literature by emphasizing the critical role of apologies and perceived outcomes in shaping customer satisfaction. The article concludes with strategic implications for service providers, advocating for a nuanced understanding of justice perceptions and emotions in tailoring effective service recovery strategies within the online apparel retail sector.
목차
Abstract Ⅰ. Introduction Ⅱ. Theoretical background 1. Justice theory Ⅲ. Literature review 1. Types of Service Recovery Activities 2. Perceived Justice in Service Recovery 3. Emotions in Service Recovery 4. Post Service Recovery Satisfaction Ⅳ. Methodology 1. Research design 2. Sample Selection and Data Collection 3. Measures Ⅴ. Results 1. Hypothesis 1 2. Hypothesis 2 3. Hypothesis 3 and 4 Ⅵ. Conclusions 1. Limitations References
키워드
Service RecoveryPerceived JusticeEmotionsSatisfactionApologyCompensation
저자
Na Young Jung [ Department of Textiles, Merchandising and Fashion Design, University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Graduate School of Business, Hanyang Cyber University ]
First Author, Corresponding Author
Yoo-Kyoung Seock [ Department of Textiles, Merchandising and Interiors, University of Georgia ]
Co-author
Brenda Cude [ Department of Financial Planning, Housing and Consumer Economics, University of Georgia ]
Co-author