감정노동자 보호조치에 대한 사업주와 근로자의 인식 차이 - 주요 서비스 직종별 비교 -
Perception Gaps between Employers and Workers on Protective Measures for Emotional Labor - A Comparative Analysis Across Major Service Occupations -
Purpose : This study compared perceptions between employers and workers regarding the implementation of emotional labor protection policies across major service sectors to improve policy effectiveness. Methods : A survey was conducted using a [one-to-one matched design] involving 1,275 workplaces across four sectors: customer service (40.2%), care services (19.9%), healthcare (19.8%), and sales (20.1%). Data were collected via face-to-face interviews [from July to September 2025]. Results : Significant perception gaps were identified. While gaps existed for [preventive measures] like voice guidance (11.5%) and response manuals (19.5%), much larger discrepancies were found in [active intervention and post-incident support]. Specifically, gaps reached 27.4% for work suspension, 33.1% for extended breaks, and up to 36.5% for counseling support. The [most substantial gap] occurred in the "prohibition of disadvantageous treatment" after requesting protection, particularly in care services (46.9%) and sales (46.1%). Conclusion : Perception gaps vary by occupation, with [post-incident meas-ures showing the greatest disparity]. These findings suggest that policy effectiveness is hindered by occupational conditions and organizational culture. [To bridge these gaps, practical and tailored implementation strategies] are essential to ensure the actual protection of emotional laborers.
목차
Abstract Ⅰ. 서론 1. 연구의 필요성 2. 연구목적 Ⅱ. 연구방법 1. 연구설계 2. 연구대상 3. 자료수집 4. 연구 도구 5. 자료분석 Ⅲ. 연구 결과 1. 직종별 사업장의 특성 (고객 상담직, 돌봄서비스직, 보건 의료직, 판매직) 2. 직종별 응답 근로자의 특성 3. 사업장의 감정노동 예방조치 및 발생 시 조치이행률: 사업주의 응답 기반 4. 사업장의 감정노동 예방조치 및 발생 시 조치인식률: 근로자 응답기반 5. 감정노동자 보호조치에 대한 사업주와 근로자의 인식 차이 Ⅳ. 논의 Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언 Conflicts of Interest 참고문헌