Earticle

초록

영어

In this study, we compared the alteration of test positions according to various test equipments when testing shoulder joint superoinferior axial to estimate the clinical usefulness of tiltable standing detector. Our objectives were patients who visited our hospital. Among them we chose patients who were prescribed to get a shoulder axial test, again we selected 30 patents whose abduction is more than 90 degree.(2008. Nov. 〜2009 Jan.) With the patents cooperation, we used CR(Agfa, Belgium), fixed-detector(Canon, japan), Tiltable-detector(Philips, Netherlands). Tested with only one equipment (tiltable detector), and posed with the other two. We surveyed 5 inspectors and 30 patients, asking them to rate the convenience of test position. Also, we checked how long it takes to have the image appear on screen after testing with the equipment. We provided a standard for an assessment of the image to an expert in bone radiology, an orthopedist and a radiologist with 5 years experience. When the patents were asked about the convenience of the equipments, 15 people(50%) answered CR is convenient and 14 people(46.7%) answered the Tilting detector is convenient, showing not much difference. However, when the inspectors were asked the same question, 4people(80%) out of 5 answered that the Tilting detector is more convenient. The time test showed that CR takes 2 minutes and 50 seconds, the Fixed detector lminute and 48 seconds andor had no distortion showing the shoulder joint space. However, even though the Fixed detector showed ac the Tilting detector takes 1 minute and 43 seconds to bring the image to the screen after the position. The results of the value of image taken by each equipment, CR and the Tilting detectromion, coracoid process, due to the unstable pose, they were quite distorted and scored poor in observing glenoid fossa. By this study, we can see that testing the shoulder joint superoinferior axial projection with a detector that has a tilting device would be more convenient than testing it with a CR.

목차

Abstract
I. 서론
II. 대상 및 방법
1. 조사대상
2. 조사방법
3. 장비 및 조전
III. 결과
1. 검사 자세의 편의성
2. 검사 소요시간(Examination time)
3. 영상평가
IV. 고찰 및 결론
참고문헌

키워드

저자

• 이동희 [ Lee, Dong-Hee | 건국대학교병원 영상의학팀 ] 교신저자
• 김병기 [ Kim, Byung-Ki | 건국대학교병원 영상의학팀 ]
• 김기정 [ Kim, Ki-Jung | 건국대학교병원 영상의학팀 ]
• 김민현 [ Kim, Min-Hyun | 건국대학교병원 영상의학팀 ]
• 이민우 [ Lee, Min-Woo | 건국대학교병원 영상의학팀 ]
• 김순배 [ Kim, Sun-Bae | 건국대학교병원 영상의학팀 ]
• 김경수 [ Kim, Gyeong-Soo | 건국대학교병원 영상의학팀 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  대한디지털의료영상학회논문지 [Korean Journal of Digital Imaging in Medicine]

• 간기

  연3회

• pISSN

  1976-7641

• 수록기간

  1995~2025

• 십진분류

  KDC 510 DDC 610