This study is to identify the factors that affect the environment of daily life by postoperative inaccuracy in bladder cancer patients. The subjects of the study conducted a survey of 71 people diagnosed with bladder cancer in an outpatient clinic in a urology of tertiary hospital in the C area from May 13 to July 10, 2024. The environment of daily life according to the general characteristics of the subjects was analyzed by t-test and ANOVA. A Scheffè test was used as a post hoc test. Multiple regression analysis was used to understand the influence of general characteristics on the environment of daily life. The results of this study are as follows, Firstly, according to general characteristics, there were significant differences according to monthly income(F=3.92, p=.004), age(F=4.18, p=0.25) in the environment of daily life. Secondly, disease-related characteristics showed significant differences according to metastasis(t=-3.17, p=.042) and recurrence(t=2.96, p=.038). Thirdly, inaccuracy and uncertainty risk assessments were significant positive correlations(r=034, p<.001). Fourthly, the explanatory power of the whole model was 63%. In multiple regression analysis, it was found that monthly income, metastasis, and recurrence significantly explained the environment of daily life. The quality of the environment was significantly explained by uncertainty assessment. Therefore, in order to improve the quality of environment of bladder cancer surgery patients, it is necessary to develop multi-faceted and practical interventions to reduce uncertainty about disease and convert evaluation of uncertainty into positive opportunity evaluation
목차
Abstract 1. INTRODUCTION 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS 2.1 Study design 2.2 Materials 2.3 Methods 3. RESULTS 3.1 General Characteristics of the Subjects 3.2 Subject's Inaccuracy, Ambiguity Assessment, and the Degree of Daily Life 3.3 The Environment of Daily Life According to the General Characteristics of the Subjects 3.4 Correlation between Inaccurate, Risk Assessments and the Environment of Daily Life 3.5 The Effect of General Characteristics and Inaccuracies on the Evaluation of Daily Life 4. DISCUSSION 5. CONCLUSION REFERENCES