Background: The situation in which radiation emerges uncontrollably is referred to as a radiation accident. Radiation accidents constitute emergencies that can have severe impacts on public health. Therefore, it is of critical importance for hospitals providing healthcare services to be adequately prepared for such incidents. Materials and Methods: This study aims to compare the hospital management protocols for radiation accidents in Türkiye and Japan using the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats (SWOT) analysis method. As a country that has experienced a radiation accident, Japan’s postincident developments are compared with Türkiye’s current situation. The study first examines the radiation safety regulations, healthcare policies, and hospital management strategies of both countries. While Türkiye has established general protocols under the Hospital Disaster and Emergency Plan (HAP) and for Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) incidents, Japan has enhanced its crisis management and emergency response systems following the 2011 Fukushima Nuclear Accident. Within the framework of the SWOT analysis, the strengths and weaknesses of both countries, potential threats, and opportunities for improvement are analyzed in detail. Results and Discussion: This study highlights how Türkiye can benefit from Japan’s crisis management experience to enhance its preparedness for radiation accidents. The analysis reveals that Türkiye has significant shortcomings, particularly in training, drills, and hospital infrastructure. However, its investments in nuclear energy provide opportunities for development through international collaborations. On the other hand, although Japan possesses advanced radiation monitoring systems and extensive experience, it remains under constant threat due to its high concentration of nuclear power plants and exposure to natural disasters. Conclusion: To prevent radiation accidents, it is recommended to develop a hospital management model based on international standards. Additionally, effective intervention strategies should be formulated through the collaborative decision-making of hospital administrators, healthcare professionals, and policymakers to ensure a comprehensive response to radiation accidents.
목차
ABSTRACT Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Article Information References
대한방사선방어학회 [Korean Association For Radiation Protection]
설립연도
1975
분야
자연과학>기타자연과학
소개
회원 상호간의 협조와 친목을 도모함으로써 방사선방어에 관한 제반연구 및 발전에 이바지함을 물론 학술의 국제교류 및 국제학술단체와의 상호협력 증진에 기여함을 목적으로 하며, 이 목적을 달성하기 위하여 다음 각 호의 사업을 한다.
1. 방사선방어에 관한 학술연구발표회 및 강연회 등의 개최
2. 학회지 및 방사선방어에 관한 학술간행물의 발행 및 배포
3. 방사선방어에 관한 학술의 국제교류 및 협력
4. 방사선방어에 관한 국제학술자료의 조사, 수집 및 번역
5. 방사선방어에 관한 조사 및 연구용역
6. 회원의 연구활동을 위한 제반협조
7. 기타 본 학회의 목적 달성에 필요한 사항
간행물
간행물명
방사선방어학회지 [Journal of Radiation Protection and Research]