Moral education is concerned with growing moral persons through developing their morality Moral action takes the moral point of view. The teacher needs a vision of moral man, some sense of the person as moral actor or agent. So the moral agent is neither raw intellect nor disembodied reasoning but has feelings and emotions and passions that play a great part in the moral life. But this affective component is one that many of us ignore or, at least, underestimate through moral philosophy and moral education. Especially Kolberg's model assumes that the moral life is primary the result of the development of specific, often abstract moral principals that are capable of being expressed in verbal form. The model derives from Piaget's idea of stages of mental development, and the particular principal of justice incorporated in the system is that of the philosopher Rawls, Kant, and Platon. In short, this model presents moral development as a process of abstract cognitive development, as a growth in rational competence expressed in increasing sophisticated principles of moral reasoning. However ethics of justice is subject to many drawbacks. An ethics of care may be argued in terms of alternative -ethics to overcome the limitation of ethics justice. However An ethics of justice and An ethics care should be integrate. For bridge justice between care, presents an approach to morality that stems from Carol Gilligan‘s work distinguishing a moral orientation of care from a morality of justice. In the chapter Ⅱ illustrates each orientation, and integrates care with justice. Gilligan's research on relational caring, and its applications to schooling promises crucial addition to moral discussion here, increasing interpersonal focus. The Ⅲ. integrates care with justice In final Ⅳ. suggest a valuable education program that employes elements from both the character education and developmental perspectives. Teaching methods is also understood intergratidly. Teaching methods should not be focused upon superficial ethical knowledge but be focused upon ethical issues and problems in our society. Teachers should deal with the affective, behavior domains such as moral values, attitudes and dispositions as well as the cognitive domains such as moral knowledge and judgement. Evaluation of ‘Moral Education’ should include moral knowledge, moral reasoning, moral values & attitudes, moral dispositions, and moral behavior. Various assessment techniques, such as personal observation, interviews, students essays, the student's portfolio, and performance tests should be utilized to measure the extent of student progress. And in other to facilitate students moral actions, evaluation of ‘Moral Education’ should be enlarged to service projects and social participation activities.
한국윤리교육학회 [The Korean Ethics Education Association]
설립연도
2000
분야
사회과학>교육학
소개
본 학회는 윤리, 도덕 교과교육학과 교과내용학의 연구발전에 기여하려는 목적하에 설립되어 전국대학교의 윤리, 도덕교육 관련교수들과 대학원 석사, 박사과정을 이수하고 있는 현장교사들을 회원으로 하고 있는 순수 학술단체이다. 이러한 설립목적을 달성하기 위하여 연구, 학술회의 및 워크??, 학술교류, 출판활동에 주력하여 본 학회가 운영됨으로써 전국대학과 초중등학교에 있는 회원들의 학구열을 고취시키고 일선학교의 윤리교육분야의 질적 수준을 높이고, 한국의 윤리, 도덕교육에 기여하게 될 것으로 생각된다.