Earticle

초록

영어

News discourse plays a pivotal role in representing ideological perspectives on news events. This paper analyzes news opinions on the 2023 collapse of Silicon Valley Bank in terms of political ideology by examining lexical choices, based on the assumption that political ideologies of news media influence their interpretations of economic issues and the ideological perspectives are conveyed through language. For this purpose, The New York Times and The Korean Economic Daily are selected for analysis. The headlines and leads of the news opinions are examined qualitatively, while keyword frequencies are measured as a quantitative approach. The results of the analysis clearly reveal ideological differences between the two newspapers: the former adopts a progressive stance, emphasizing accountability for the financial turmoil by criticizing the Federal Reserve for deregulation, aggressive monetary policy, and insufficient oversight of Silicon Valley Bank—issues commonly associated with progressive stances. In contrast, the latter focuses more on practical measures to mitigate the economic fallout of the crisis. These findings demonstrate that ideological differences are reflected in the newspapers’ lexical choices.

목차

Abstract
1. INTRODUCTION
2. The Collapse of Silicon Valley Bank
3. Critical Discourse Analysis and Methodology
4. Analysis and Discussion
5. Conclusions
Acknowledgement
REFERENCES

키워드

저자

• Hyun Ban [ Prof., Dept. of Media and Communication, Incheon National University, Korea ] Corresponding Author

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  The International Journal of Advanced Smart Convergence

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  2288-2847

• eISSN

  2288-2855

• 수록기간

  2012~2025

• 십진분류

  KDC 326 DDC 380