Taewook Kim, Heejun Youn, Yuseong Lee, Jinyoung Park, Soonchul Kwon
언어
영어(ENG)
URL
https://www.earticle.net/Article/A470042
※ 원문제공기관과의 협약기간이 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.
원문정보
초록
영어
In strawberry cultivation, simultaneous detection of fruit ripeness and leaf diseases is very important to maximize yield and ensure crop health. In this study, we propose an ensemble technique combining an improved YOLOv8l and a ResNet50-based Faster R-CNN model. The YOLOv8l model reduces the number of parameters by 29% by replacing the standard backbone with ConvNeXtV2, introducing the BiFPN neck structure, and integrating the GRN layer, but the accuracy is lowered. However, the accuracy is improved by integrating the model ensemble technique and the Weighted Box Fusion algorithm. The experiment is conducted using 5,000 strawberry images collected from a smart farm in Cheonan-si, South Korea from January to April 2025. The dataset has a total of nine classes, including five maturity stages (Flower, Green, White, Turning Red, and Red) and four leaf disease states (Chlorosis, Tip Dieback, wilt, and Plauge). Experimental results show that the proposed model architecture achieves 0.8623 at mAP@0.5, which improves the performance by about 8% compared to the single-model approach. In particular, the system demonstrates excellent performance in detecting visually distinct classes such as flowers, while achieving good results even for classes with subtle features such as early-stage diseases. Visual analysis confirms the robustness of the model even in complex agricultural environments with various lighting conditions and overlapping objects. Therefore, it contributes to the development of an automated monitoring system for strawberry cultivation in greenhouse environments and has significant potential for application in various smart agricultural environments.
목차
Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Background Theory 2.1 YOLOv8 Architecture 2.2 Related Work 3. Proposed Method 3.1 Improved YOLOv8 Architecture 3.2 Ensemble Model Techniques for Multi-Task Detection 4. Experimental environment and Results 4.1 Data Acquisition 4.2 Training Configuration and Hyperparameters 4.3 Evaluation Metrics 4.4 Performance Comparison 5. Conclusion Acknowledgement References