Earticle

초록

영어

The purpose of this study was to evaluate smoking of dental technicians in 2005, and wehave distributed questionnaires about smoking in 2005-KDTA general meeting and analyzedthem. All 555 respondents who attended KDTA general meeting were selected by randomsampling. However we dismissed 41 because of invalidness, so we got 504 people. Therefore,we have got conclusions below:1. The rate of smokers who attended in 2005 KDTA was 33.93%, 46.3% in men, 1.44% inwomen. When we compared to other specialist groups, the rate of dental technician smokerswas higher than them.2. When we analyzed the ages of first smoking, 55.56% of the people started to smoke whenthey were in 24 years old. This result was very similar to the rate of dentist smokers in 2005KDA research.3. According to the answers of smokers and people who wire smokers in the past aboutquitting smoking period and willness in future, 60.82% among all members failed to quitsmoking and also 69.2% among all members did not leap over 3 months but, they have thought to quit smoking for 6 months. 4. According to the answers about antismoking training related to environment in dentaland clinical labs, most dental technicians(92.66%) have never been trained, also 37.70% amongall members have not fulfilled their duty at self office. They have not recognized the danger ofthe indirect smoking. 5. When we asked chiefs in dental and clinical labs, the reason why they, didn't do theantismoking training their staffs, 32.1% of them replied that they were so busy, and 42.13%did because of their staffs, abhorrence and needlessness.6. As Pan-dentistry members, over 80% agreed to the thought of the antismoking, also hadmedical knowledge about smoking. So we have the conclusion that dental technicians haveidentification as the Pan-dentistry members.7. Most dental technicians expected KDTA to play a role about the antismoking training fortheir members.We have two suggestions to KDTA about the antismoking problem for members accordingto above conclusions.First, KDTA should prepare the antismoking training in the curriculum. Second, KDTAshould support the antismoking programs of schools for students.

목차

Abstract
 Ⅰ. 서론
 Ⅱ. 연구방법 및 대상
 Ⅲ. 연구 결과
  1. 치과기공사 설문응답자중 전신질환 유무에 대한 결과
  2. 치과기공사의 직위와 성별에 따른 연령 분포
  3. 치과기공사의 현재 및 과거의 흡연상태
  4. 현재 흡연자들의 흡연양상이나 정보
  5. 현재 흡연자중 과거 금연한 경험이나 기간 또는 금연의지유무
  6. 금연을 한 대상자들의 과거 흡연에 관련된 질문
  7. 금연자들의 주된 흡연중지 이유
  8. 치과기공소나 기공실의 임상현장과 관련된 금연정보
  9. 현재 직원에게 금연 교육을 하지 못하는 이유
  10. 치과기공사의흡연에대한인식
 Ⅳ. 고찰
 Ⅴ. 결론
 <참고문헌>

키워드

저자

• 박용덕 [ Yong-Duk Park | 경희대학교 치과대학 예방치과학교실 ]
• 황경숙 [ Kyung-Sook Hwang | 신흥대학 치기공과 ]
• 김남중 [ Nam-Joong Kim | 신흥대학 치기공과 ]
• 강종오 [ Jong-Oh Kang | 신흥대학 치위생과 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  대한치과기공학회지 [THE JOURNAL OF KOREAN ACADEMY OF DENTAL TECHNOLOGY]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1229-3954

• eISSN

  2288-5218

• 수록기간

  1979~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 515 DDC 617