Background: This study conducted a meta-analysis of domestic randomized controlled trials to evaluate how various manual therapy techniques influence neck disability. Although manual interventions such as Maitland, McKenzie, Mulligan, Kaltenborn, and chiropractic methods are routinely used for non-specific neck pain, their aggregate effects on pain reduction, functional improvement, and cervical range of motion remain unclear. Methods: The five domestic databases were used to implement literature searches independently. A total of 19 out of 925 selected articles were used to analyze, except those overlapped (n=219), those irrelevant to neck disability (n=364), those consisting of the abstract and presentation notes alone (n=19), those without manual therapy intervention or dealing with other types of intervention (n=298), and those making it possible to apply the same kind of intervention to other sites (n=6). The intervention followed the guidelines presented as five types of manual therapy, and used the risk of bias in Cochrane library to assess the quality of the literature. Results: An uncertain risk was ‘random sequence generation' in three articles and ‘non-public grouping' in fifteen articles. ‘Blinding of the subjects and the researcher' was mentioned in only one article, and no article mentioned ‘blinding for result assessment'. Seven articles were at high risk of ‘incomplete results,' and one was at high risk of ‘selective result report'. Conclusion: Current domestic evidence indicates that manual therapy methods significantly alleviate pain, decrease neck-related disability, and enhance cervical mobility in patients with neck dysfunction. To strengthen these findings, future trials should employ rigorous blinding, standardized intervention protocols, and larger samples. Integrating manual therapy into multidisciplinary rehabilitation programs is supported by this meta-analysis as an effective approach for managing neck disability.
목차
ABSTRACT Ⅰ. 서론 Ⅱ. 연구 방법 1. 연구 설계 2. 문헌 수집 및 선정과정 3. 연구문헌의 코딩 4. 자료 분석 방법 Ⅲ. 연구결과 1. 연구의 선정과정 2. 선정된 연구의 일반적인 특성 3. 연구의 질 평가 Ⅳ. 고찰 1. 연구의 선정과정에 관한 고찰 2. 선정된 연구들에 관한 고찰 3. 연구 결과와 질 평가에 대한 고찰 4. 연구의 제한점 Ⅴ. 결론 참고문헌
키워드
Manual therapySystematic literature reviewNeck disability
대한정형도수물리치료학회 [Korean Academy of Orthopedic Manual Therapy]
설립연도
1992
분야
의약학>물리치료학
소개
대한정형물리치료학회는 대한물리치료사학회 정형물리치료 분과학회로서 정형물리치료학 분야의 연구및 학문발전에 목적을 가지고 있습니다.
본 학회에서는 다음과 같은 사업을 주관하고 있습니다.
첫째. 정형물리치료 분야 및 관련분야의 연구가 이루어지고 있으며,
둘째. 정형물리치료 연수위원회 운영 및 교육프로그램을 개발하고,
셋째. 학술대회 및 세미나를 개최하며,
넷째. 학회지 및 관련 도서를 발간 하고 있으며,
다섯째. 국제 및 국내 유관단체와 학술교류를 담당하고 있습니다.
간행물
간행물명
대한정형도수물리치료학회지 [The Journal of Korean Academy of Orthopedic Manual Physical Therapy]