Earticle

초록

영어

In order to resolve disputes through arbitration, an arbitration agreement must be agreed between the parties, and the agreed arbitration agreement must be valid. If the parties object to the validity of an arbitration agreement, arbitration-related laws in major countries, including UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, allow the arbitral tribunal to have the right to make a priority decision on it, and the court to conduct a judicial review afterwards. China's arbitration laws and related laws, however, stipulate that if an arbitration party has an objection to the validity of the arbitration agreement, it can raise an objection to the arbitration institution or court before the initial arbitration hearing date. In addition, if one party applies to the court to verify the validity of the arbitration agreement before the first arbitration hearing date, and the other party applies to the arbitration institution for verification of it and the decision is not made, the court has the right to make a priority decision on the validity of the arbitration agreement. China's validity verification system for the arbitration agreement limits the autonomy, speed, and independence of arbitration.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 중국의 중재합의 유효성확인 규정
Ⅲ. 중국의 중재합의 유효성확인 관련 사례
Ⅳ. 중국의 중재합의 유효성 확인제도의 특징 및문제점
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌

키워드

저자

• 하현수 [ Hyun-Soo Ha | 전북대학교 무역학과 교수, 동 산업경제연구소 연구원 ] 주저자

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  무역통상학회지 [Journal of Korea Research Association of International Commerce]

• 간기

  격월간

• pISSN

  1738-4354

• 수록기간

  2001~2025

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 326 DDC 380