Earticle

초록

영어

Article 3 of the CISG provides that a contract to manufacture or produce and supply goods is considered a sale, but this does not apply if the party ordering the goods has agreed to supply a significant part of the materials required for manufacture or production. It is also stipulated that it does not apply to contracts in which the majority of the obligations of the party supplying goods consist of the supply of labor or other services. However, terms such as ‘a significant part’ and ‘most of the time’ are not explicit definitions and are therefore subject to debate. Currently, international commercial contracts are diverse and complex, so CISG, which does not have explicit provisions, is often not applicable and has the problem of being limited. It is questionable whether it can be applied to various types of international commerce today, and the limited scope of application of the CISG will threaten the usefulness and long-term viability of international agreements. Accordingly, in order to find out the need for a unified norm, we will look into the interpretation principles of Article 3 of the CISG and suggest ways to improve them through a comparative study with CESL.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. CISG 제3조의 적용범위
Ⅲ. CISG 제3조의 분쟁사례 검토
Ⅳ. CESL과의 비교를 통한 개선방안
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌

키워드

저자

• 김철수 [ CheolSoo Kim | 부경대학교, 교수 ] 제1저자
• 권택규 [ Taekgyu Kwon | 부경대학교, 석사 ] 교신저자

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  무역통상학회지 [Journal of Korea Research Association of International Commerce]

• 간기

  격월간

• pISSN

  1738-4354

• 수록기간

  2001~2025

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 326 DDC 380