Earticle

현재 위치 Home

NMS(New Media Service)

Web3 Business Model Innovation Approach and Cases of Korean Game Giants

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    국제인공지능학회(구 한국인터넷방송통신학회) 바로가기
  • 간행물
    International Journal of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication 바로가기
  • 통권
    Vol.16 No.1 (2024.03)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.241-252
  • 저자
    Song, Minzheong
  • 언어
    영어(ENG)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A445431

※ 원문제공기관과의 협약기간이 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.

원문정보

초록

영어
We analyze the types of Web3 business model innovation (BMI) of the six major Korean game companies by market size. As a result of the analysis, Nexon is watched as the adapter. It introduces blockchain (BC) layer 2, ‘Polygon’ to the extended ecosystem such as the creator’s secondary creation, item utility, and compensation experience using the existing core intellectual property (IP). KakaoGames and Neowiz are watched as the adventurers. KakaoGames introduces BC layer 2, ‘Polygon’ and ‘Near Protocol’ to various experiments using tokenomics models in casual games and massively multiplayer online role-playing games (MMORPGs) using several existing popular IPs. Neowiz also introduces BC layer 2, ‘Polygon’ and ‘Avalanche’ to the IntellaX platform using existing game IPs. As the reinventor, Netmable positions as a game publisher that releases third-party games based on multi-chain infrastructure such as Klaytn, BNB Chain, Near Protocol, Aptos Foundation, and introduces BC to new core IPs. Finally, there are Wemade and Com2us as the mavericks. They aim to be the Web3 platform operators that create a BC layer 1 ecosystem and provide services that encompass BC games, GameFi, and non-fungible tokens (NFTs). Here are the implications of the four types of BMI. In terms of infrastructure, Nexon, KakaoGames, and Neowiz try to introduce a part of crosschain, whereas Netmable tries to move toward a complete multi-chain strategy, and Wemade and Com2us also try to consider multi-chain, even if they have the full BC introduction. In terms of defending against market decline, Nexon and Netmable have a different position. Nexon which has a greater market dominance, only tries to continuously experiment, but Netmable is aggressively focusing on monetizing new products. Attacks on growth aspirations also show two different positions. KakaoGames and Neowiz only try to aggressively explore, while WeMade and Com2us try to set new standards for industrial innovation.

목차

Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review and Theoretical Background
2.1 Previous Literature Review
2.2 Theoretical Background
3. Research Design
4. Results
4.1 Adapter defending against Disruption and expanding into the Noncore
4.2 Adventurer aspiring for Breakout Growth and expanding into the Noncore
4.3 Reinventor defending against Disruption and transforming the Core
4.4 Maverick aspiring for Breakout Growth and transforming the Core
5. Conclusion
References

저자

  • Song, Minzheong [ Associate professor, Department of Media Communication & Advertising, Hansei University ] Corresponding author

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    국제인공지능학회(구 한국인터넷방송통신학회) [The International Association for Artificial Intelligence]
  • 설립연도
    2000
  • 분야
    공학>전자/정보통신공학
  • 소개
    인터넷방송, 인터넷 TV , 방송 통신 네트워크 및 관련 분야에 대한 국내는 물론 국제적인 학술, 기술의 진흥발전에 공헌하고 지식 정보화 사회에 기여하고자 한다.

간행물

  • 간행물명
    International Journal of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication
  • 간기
    계간
  • pISSN
    2288-4920
  • eISSN
    2288-4939
  • 수록기간
    2009~2025
  • 십진분류
    KDC 326 DDC 380

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / International Journal of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication Vol.16 No.1

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장