Earticle

초록

영어

The current administrative reconsideration procedures, as stipulated in the Administrative Reconsideration Law, exhibit administrative procedural characteristics. These are evident in the greater emphasis on efficiency in the administrative reconsideration trial, the granting of broader procedural discretion to the administrative reconsideration subject, and the respect for the administrative discretion of the administrative reconsideration subject. However, due to the nature of dispute adjudication, the focus on administrative efficiency in administrative reconsideration trial often hinders the rectification of administrative misconduct, the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the parties concerned, and the legislative goals of administrative internal supervision. This has resulted in several problems, including the overlap between the reconsideration subject and one of the parties concerned, excessive negligence of due process, the necessity to establish a coherence procedure with litigation, and the need to strengthen the professionalism of reconsideration organizations and personnel. Therefore, to align with the system goal of making administrative reconsideration as the main channel for the substantive settlement of administrative disputes, it is recommended to establish an administrative reconsideration department under the same level of government to centralize the management of administrative reconsideration cases, to formulate procedural rules for the quasi-judicialization of administrative reconsideration trials, to add organic coherence procedures with administrative litigation, and to formulate a special system for the selection and career development of administrative reconsideration commissioners, so as to complete the construction of the quasi-judicialization of administrative reconsideration trial procedures.

한국어

행정심판재심의 심리절차를 규정하는 ｢행정심의법｣에 따르면, 현재의 행정심판재심 심리절차는 행정절차적 특성을 가지고 있다. 행정심판재심의 효율성을 더욱 중시하고 행정심판재심의 주체로 하여금 절차적 재량권을 부여함으로써 행정재량을 존중하고 있다. 그러나 행정심판재심의 심리는 분쟁을 다투는 재판적 성격을 가짐으로 인해 행정효 율에 더 치중되어 있어 부당한 행정행위에 대한 재심의, 당사자의 합법적 권리보호, 행정 내부감독의 입법목적 등에는 크게 도움이 되지 않는다. 즉, 제도의 실질적 운영에 있어 재심의 주체와 당사자 일방의 사실이 중복되고, 절차적 정당성이 과도하게 무시되며, 소송심리절차와의 연계절차가 부족한 점, 그리고 이를 극복하기 위하여는 행정심판재심 을 위한 전문인력 양성이라는 문제 등이 존재한다. 따라서 행정심판재심이 행정쟁의를 실질적으로 해결할 수 있는 주요 근거법으로서의 역할을 위해서는 행정재심의 안건을 중앙정부가 직접 관리하는 행정재심의기관을 설립하 여 행정심판재심의 및 심리절차의 준사법화 절차를 마련하여야 한다. 또 행정소송절차와 의 유기적 연결이 가능하도록 하고, 특별 행정심판재심위원 선정시스템을 구축하는 등의 개선이 필요하다.

중국어

从《行政复议法》关于行政复议审理程序的制度文本来看，当前的行政复议审理程序 呈现行政程序化特征，体现为更加重视行政复议审理过程中的效率、赋予行政复议主体 宽松的程序自由裁量权和尊重行政复议主体的行政裁量权。然而，由于行政复议审理的 纠纷裁判性质，这种更加偏重于行政效率的行政复议审理程序在很大程度上不利于实现 行政复议矫正不当行政行为、保护当事人合法权益，以及行政内部监督的立法目的，导 致实践中存在复议审理主体与当事人一方的事实重合、过度忽视程序正当性、与诉讼审 理程序的衔接程序亟需构建、复议审理组织和人员的专业化有待加强等问题。 因此，基于将行政复议真正打造为行政争议实质化解的主渠道这一制度目标，可以设 立隶属于同级政府集中管理行政复议案件的行政复议机关、建构行政复议审理程序准司 法化的程序规则、增设与行政诉讼的有机衔接程序、制定专门的行政复议委员选拔制度 与职业发展制度，从而完善对行政复议审理程序准司法化的制度构建。

목차

Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Legal analysis of China’s administrative reconsideration trial procedures and consideration on problems
Ⅲ. Comparative analysis of similar administrative judicial systems in other countries
Ⅳ. System arrangement of quasi-judicialization of China’s administrative reconsideration trial procedures
Ⅴ. Conclusion
References
국문초록
Abstract
中文摘要

키워드

행정심판재심 주요경로 심리절차 행정절차화 준사법화 Administrative reconsideration Main channel Trial procedures Administrative proceduralization Quasi-judicialization 行政复议 主渠道 审理程序 行政程序化 准司法化

저자

• Gong, Chenhang [ 궁천항 | PhD candidate (National Governance and Law-based Government Direction), Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Constitutional and Administrative Law ] First author
• Liao, Xiujian [ 廖秀健 | Professor, Doctor of Laws, Doctoral Supervisor, School of Politicsand Public Administration, Southwest University of Political Science and Law ] Corresponding author

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물