Jaewon Choi, Jungsuk Han, Sean S. Shin, Ji Hee Yoon
언어
영어(ENG)
URL
https://www.earticle.net/Article/A438646
※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.
11,200원
원문정보
초록
영어
We show that illiquid bonds can become more expensive than liquid bonds with almost identical cash flows during market distress times. The economic mechanism behind the results is search frictions. When the search friction is high, marginal traders prefer to sell liquid bonds at lower prices than illiquid bonds because failure to find buyers can be costly. We empirically identify the reversed liquidity premium through within-issuer-date matching of bonds and the regression discontinuity design based on newly issued corporate bonds. In both the identification settings, we find that the yield differentials between illiquid and liquid bonds become negative during the market distress times. Using insurance company trades, we document transactionlevel evidence for the reversed liquidity premium for same-issuer bonds on the same day that are traded by the same insurer.
목차
Abstract 1 Introduction 2 An Illustration with a Simple Model 3 Data 3.1 Corporate Bond Data and Sample Construction 3.2 Key Variables 3.3 Summary Statistics 4 Reversed Liquidity Premium 4.1 Matching Same-issuer Bonds with Different Level of Liquidity 4.2 Regression Discontinuity Design 4.3 Search Frictions and Reversed Liquidity Premium 4.4 Same-customer Trades and Reversed Liquidity Premium: Evidence from Insurance Company 5 Conclusion References Table Figure Appendix
키워드
OTC marketLiquidityFlight-from-liquidityLimits-to-arbitragePrice pressureFire sale
저자
Jaewon Choi [ University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Department of Finance ]
Jungsuk Han [ Seoul National University, Department of Finance ]
Sean S. Shin [ Aalto University, Department of Finance ]
Ji Hee Yoon [ University College London, Department of Economics and School of Management ]