Earticle

초록

영어

This paper examines the issues related to the relevant regulations (Art.40 and Art.44) in terms of the buyer’s obligation to notify non-conformity of goods under Art.39 and the effects on the results in the CISG. The results of this study are as follows; Firstly, the trend of recent precedents regarding the ambiguity of “specificity” and “reasonable time” as requirements for the buyer’s obligation to notify non-conformity shows that the standards are being relaxed. Second, the regulations that relax or exempt the buyer’s notification obligation may actually serve a different purpose than their intended purpose. For example, in a situation where the original contract price may be paid under Art.40 for the delivery of goods of higher value, or in the seller’s waiver of rights, it is difficult to determine whether the seller’s actions indicate a waiver of such rights, In conclusion, this paper may provide the understanding of the buyer’s non-conformity notification obligation in the CISG by persenting theses issues to international trade transaction parties.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 부적합 통지에 관한 제39조의 의의
Ⅲ. 통지의 내용과 요건에관한 쟁점
Ⅳ. 불 통지 결과에 관한 쟁점
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌

키워드

저자

• 조현숙 [ Hyun-Sook Cho | 원광대학교 무역학과 교수 ] 제1저자
• 우광명 [ Kwang Myung Woo | 목원대학교 글로벌비즈니스학과 부교수 ] 교신저자

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  무역통상학회지 [Journal of Korea Research Association of International Commerce]

• 간기

  격월간

• pISSN

  1738-4354

• 수록기간

  2001~2025

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 326 DDC 380