The purpose of this study is to analyze English-speaking learners' errors in using Korean Attributive forms. To analyze the errors, I used not only the compositions written by English-speaking learners form various Korean language institutes, but also a questionnaire where the learners had to fill in the blanks in sentences using Korean attributive forms. The followings are the types of errors analyzed in this study. I also suggested how teachers could explain these errors to learners.First, common morphologic errors were made when the attributive forms come after the tense pre-final endings. Anther type of morphologic error is using ‘-어-’ or ‘-으-’ in front of ‘-는’ or ‘-던’. Therefore, teachers should explain when to use tense pre-final endings in front of the attributive forms and when not to use them. Korean tense pre-final endings. ‘-겠’ and ‘-았’ can come in front of ‘-던’ but not in front of ‘-는, 을, 은’. even if the preceding consonant starting attributive forms such as ‘-는’, or ‘-던’, but ‘-으’ has to be used in front of ‘-ㄹ’ or ‘-ㄴ’. Second, learners confused ‘-(으)ㄹ’ and ‘-는’ when ‘-는’ has meaning other than present progressive. The difference between ‘-(으)ㄹ’ and ‘-는’ can be explained through the idea of the speaker's intention. '-(으)ㄹ'conveys the speaker's intention while ‘-는’ does not. Third, ‘-던’, ‘-았던’ and ‘-(으)ㄴ’ were confused by learners. ‘-(으)ㄴ’ represents ‘past perfective’, while ‘-던’ represents ‘past imperfective’. ‘Imperfective’ can be either progressive, habitual, repetitive, or incompletion. ‘-았던’ can be used instead of ‘-(으)ㄴ’ or ‘-던’ for most of cases except ‘incompletion’.
한국언어문화교육학회 [Korean Language and Culture Education Society]
설립연도
2003
분야
인문학>영어와문학
소개
본 학회의 설립 목적은 한국어와 한국문화 교육의 활성화를 꾀하는 것이다. 다시 말해, 한국어와 한국문화 교육을 의한 바람직한 연구 방향을 모색하는 것이 본 학회의 근본 목적이다.
최근 한국어 교육의 중심 축은 한국어의 언어적 지식 교수가 아닌 의사소통능력의 신장을 위한 교수로 옮겨가고 있고, 그 변화과정에서 한국문화 교육 역시 자연스럽게 한국어교육과 밀접한 연관을 맺게 되었다. 따라서 한국어교육과 한국문화교육의 방법론을 학제간의 관점에서 연구 대상으로 삼아 체계적 연구를 꾀하는 것이 본 학회의 실제 목적이라 할 수 있다.