A study on Non-retroactivity - Focus on Problem of The statute of limitations on Suspension·Extention·Exclusion -
-
- 발행기관
- 동국대학교 비교법문화연구원 바로가기
-
- 간행물
- DONGGUK LAW REVIEW 바로가기
-
- 통권
- Volume 14 (2020.12)바로가기
-
- 페이지
- pp.91-109
-
- 저자
-
- 언어
- 영어(ENG)
-
- URL
- https://www.earticle.net/Article/A426888
※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.
원문정보
초록
- 영어
- The purpose of this paper is to discuss whether the principle of Ex Post Facto can be applied in statute of limitations, a procedural rule abolishes the prosecution right in case of not being prosecuted during a certain period after criminal acts are committed. Article 13(1) of the Constitution stipulates this principle by declaring: “No citizen shall be prosecuted for an act which does not constitute a crime under the Act in force at the time it was committed.” Although it is undeniable that this principle, one of legal norms derived from the Principle of Legality which usually described as “Nulla poena sine lege” is fundamental principle of substantive criminal law, whether the same can be said for the legal rules of criminal proceedings is neither crystal clear nor actively discussed. However, since the retrospective application of suspension, extension and exclusion to statute of limitations might cause adverse outcomes to criminal defendant in many cases, whether the principle of Ex Post Facto can also be applied in these regulations is matter which is theoretically important and practically consequential. In this article, therefore, the author attempts to clarify the legal characteristics of statutes of limitation(whether it is procedural or substantive); provides analysis whether or not the regulations on suspension, extension and exclusion of it recognize the retroactive effect; introduces two Supreme Court cases regarding the subject.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Theoretical Basis of Non-retroactivity
1. Substantial theory
2. Procedural theory
3. Combination theory
4. Judicial precedent about Essence of Non-retroactivity
Ⅲ. Whether or not the regulations on suspension, extension, and exclusion of the statute of limitations recognize the retroactive effect
1. Absolutely positive theory of Retroactivity
2. Relatively positive theory of Retroactivity
3. Exceptionally positive theory of Retroactivity
4. Absolutely positive theory of Non-Retroactivity
5. Judicial precedent about the retroactive effect
6. Opinion
Ⅳ. [Cases of suspension, extension, and exclusion of the statute of limitations]
1. [Case 1 : Crime of quasi-raped the disabled]
2. [Case 2 : Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, Etc. of Child Abuse Crimes(“Act on Punishment of Child Abuse”)]
3. Opinion
Ⅴ. Conclusion
[References]
키워드
Non-retroactivity The statute of limitations The statute of limitations on Suspension·Extention·Exclusion.저자
간행물 정보
발행기관
-
- 발행기관명
- 동국대학교 비교법문화연구원 [The Institute of Comparative Law and Legal Culture]
- 설립연도
- 2000
- 분야
- 사회과학>법학
- 소개
- 본 연구소에서는 세계 각국의 새로운 법률제도를 그때그때 입수하여 이를 소개하고 한국 실정에 접목가능성을 연구·분석한다. 아울러 본 연구소는 국내의 각종 학술단체, 연구소, 연구기관과의 교류를 증진함은 물론 외국대학의 연구소와 공동연구를 통해 외국의 법문화와 학풍을 소개함으로써 대외적인 학풍선양에도 기여하게 함을 목적으로 한다.
간행물
-
- 간행물명
- DONGGUK LAW REVIEW
- 간기
- 반년간
- pISSN
- 2287-9676
- 수록기간
- 2012~2025
- 십진분류
- KDC 360 DDC 340
이 권호 내 다른 논문 / DONGGUK LAW REVIEW Volume 14
피인용수 : 0건 (자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)
함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.
0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.