Earticle

현재 위치 Home

A Study on Guaranteeing the data subject’s right to be informed - focused on comparative study between Korea’s PIPA and EU’s GDPR -

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    동국대학교 비교법문화연구원 바로가기
  • 간행물
    DONGGUK LAW REVIEW 바로가기
  • 통권
    Volume 14 (2020.12)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.59-89
  • 저자
    Kim, Hyun Sook
  • 언어
    영어(ENG)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A426887

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

7,200원

원문정보

초록

영어
Anyone who collects and uses other people’s data must meet legal requirements such as prior consent from the data subject. Data controllers who can legally process other people’s data must comply with the corresponding rules. In this context, controllers also disclose and inform all matters related to the processing of such data subject. After the OECD adopted the privacy principle of transparent and fair processing, most countries have accepted it, including the EU and Korea. The data subject must know who, for what purpose, and how their data is processed in order to control their data. The data subject’s right to basic information on data processing is the prerequisite for exercising their rights to rectification, erasure, etc. However, this basic principle has been mitigated as Korea revised the Personal Information Protection Act in February 2020. The PIPA introduced an exceptional case of data processing, pseudonymization. When data controllers process pseudonymized personal data, they can process it without prior consent from the data subject and without notifying the data subject of relevant information related to the processing. Korea publicly announced it would revise the PIPA by referring to European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation. Still, GDPR does not eliminate the data controller’s obligation to notify when pseudonymized processing. Only consent is exempted if the data initially collected is pseudonymized for compatible purposes such as statistical, scientific research, or archiving purposes in the public interest. This inconsistency appears because the systems of both laws do not match perfectly even though they are much similar. This paper suggests how the PIPA guarantees the data subject’s right to basic information when processing by a comparative study between Korea’s PIPA and the EU’s GDPR. Notification of data processing is crucial in ensuring the right to informational self-determination that the PIPA should accomplish as the ultimate goal.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Right to be informed of data processing
1. Legal implication
2. Right to be informed in the Personal Information Protection Act
III. Suggestions for the Notification System in the PIPA referred to the GDPR
1. Notification when processing based on legitimate bases other than consent
2. Notification of pseudonymized data processing
Ⅳ. Conclusion
[References]

키워드

Personal Information Protection Act(Korea) General Data Protection Act(European Union) Principle of Transparency and Fairness Notification Obligation Exemption from Notification Right to be informed Right to informational self-determination Pseudonymization Compatibility of Purposes for processing

저자

  • Kim, Hyun Sook [ Senior Director of Ministry of the Interior and Safety, Adjunct Professor / Ph.D. Dongguk University ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    동국대학교 비교법문화연구원 [The Institute of Comparative Law and Legal Culture]
  • 설립연도
    2000
  • 분야
    사회과학>법학
  • 소개
    본 연구소에서는 세계 각국의 새로운 법률제도를 그때그때 입수하여 이를 소개하고 한국 실정에 접목가능성을 연구·분석한다. 아울러 본 연구소는 국내의 각종 학술단체, 연구소, 연구기관과의 교류를 증진함은 물론 외국대학의 연구소와 공동연구를 통해 외국의 법문화와 학풍을 소개함으로써 대외적인 학풍선양에도 기여하게 함을 목적으로 한다.

간행물

  • 간행물명
    DONGGUK LAW REVIEW
  • 간기
    반년간
  • pISSN
    2287-9676
  • 수록기간
    2012~2025
  • 십진분류
    KDC 360 DDC 340

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / DONGGUK LAW REVIEW Volume 14

    피인용수 : 0건 (자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      출처 : 네이버학술정보

        0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.

        페이지 저장
        소속기관 조회
        이용자님의 소속기관(단체)이 서비스에 가입되어 있는지 확인해 보십시오.
        기관회원에 소속되어 있는 이용자는 원문을 무료로 이용할 수 있습니다.