Earticle

초록

영어

Non market economy is the system in which the government determines price and resource allocation. Although NME had not been a major concern under the GATT system, it became a major issues for the WTO regime, especially after China’s entry into the multilateral trading system. The US accused China of not only unfulfilling its commitment of transit to market principle system but also moving toward more mercantilist regime. In attempts to combat such unfair trade practices, the US wants to reform current WTO system. By focusing on the issues related with the US complaints against China through the dispute settlement process, this paper tries to identify areas in the current WTO clauses that were unable to regulate NME issues. While GATS, AG, TRIPS, SCM, and AD are candidates, in a system of consensus based decision, it would be difficult to amend contents of major agreements. However, revising dispute settlement processes or strengthening trade policy mechanism might be achievable alternatives. Abandoning WTO, establishing a new system or, as under Trump regime, unilateral action could also be sought. However, as the conflicts between two major trading nations could lead to dangerous consequences, it may be desirable to devise a new paradigm to achieve compromise and prosperity together in the face of the NME challenges.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 기존 문헌의 검토
Ⅲ. 미국의 대중제소 분쟁과 경과
Ⅳ. 현행 WTO 체제에 대한 미국의 불만
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌

키워드

저자

• 권영민 [ Youngmin Kwon | 명지대학교 국제통상학과 교수 ] 제1연구자

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  무역통상학회지 [Journal of Korea Research Association of International Commerce]

• 간기

  격월간

• pISSN

  1738-4354

• 수록기간

  2001~2025

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 326 DDC 380