Jeongkwon Seo, Woojin Yang, Hyejin Mun, Chul Ho Lee
언어
영어(ENG)
URL
https://www.earticle.net/Article/A408066
※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.
4,900원
원문정보
초록
영어
The government-driven open data policies are on the rise to protect consumers from misunderstandings and monitor the companies. However, in contract-based industries such as insurance, the contract-inherent characteristics make information asymmetry between consumers and companies. Our paper focuses on insurance contracts where the contingency has high uncertainty of occurrence, and the clauses may incur high costs of reading. Given those contracts, we hypothesized that the contract’s clear statement decreases customer dissatisfaction and lowers the number of complaints. To empirically support the claim, we collected customers’ complaint documents of insurance companies and insurance contracts from 2005 until 2017. Our econometric models showed that clearer statements and words significantly reduce the complaints after controlling for firm-specific heterogeneity and time-specific heterogeneity. We identify that insurance companies’ complaint ratio significantly differ depending on the insurance contract, including specific clauses and words.
목차
ABSTRACT Ⅰ. Introduction Ⅱ. Conceptual Background 2.1. Incomplete Contract Theory 2.2. Complaints in Insurance Industry 2.3. Insurance Contract and Ambiguity 2.4. Ambiguity Type 2.5. POS tagging & Text mining Ⅲ. Research Methodology 3.1. Data Source and Data Sampling 3.2. Empirical Methodology Ⅳ. Data Analysis and result 4.1. Baseline Result 4.2. Ambiguity Index 4.3. Word Class 4.4. Individual Words 4.5. Meanings Analysis Ⅴ. Conclusion