In this paper, in order to show Japanese language learners how to use ‘morau’ and ‘ukeru’, I considered the relationship between meanings in each word from the perspective of semantic extension and compared the central and peripheral meanings of these two words. As a result, the following four points were derived. 1) There is a giver in the event represented by ‘morau’, but there is not necessarily a giver in the event represented by ‘ukeru’. This is because the event represented by ‘morau’ cannot be established without the subject giving the object, but the event represented by ‘ukeru’ can be established without the subject giving the object. 2) The object of ‘morau’ is a thing, and the object of ‘ukeru’ is an event. 3) ‘Morau’ implies “receiving a thing from the giver” or an event similar to this, and ‘ukeru’ implies “whether or not there is a response to the event represented by the object”. 4) ‘Morau’ implies “making the object my own”, but ‘ukeru’ does not have such an implication.
한국일본언어문화학회 [Japanese Language & Culture Association of Korea]
설립연도
2001
분야
인문학>일본어와문학
소개
본 학회는 일본어학 및 일본문학은 물론, 일본의 정치, 경제, 문화, 사회 등의 일본학 전반에 걸친 연구 및 일본의 언어, 문화를 매체로 한 한국과의 비교 연구를 대상으로 하고 있다. 본 학회는 회원들에게 연구 발표 및 정보 교환의 기회를 부여하고 나아가 한국에서의 바람직한 일본 연구 자세를 확립하는 것을 주된 목표로 하고 있다.