Earticle

초록

영어

This study visualizes different positions of Germany and the counter-coalition of the EU members in the process of financial integration. The European Union, established by the Maastricht Treaty in 1993, has achieved an economic and monetary union (EMU), but has experienced the eurozone crisis due to lack of fiscal and financial integrations into its internal market. To deal with the instability of its economic system caused by the incomplete internal market, the EU members have pursued a banking union (BU) and a capital market union (CMU). The banking union has already established two of the three pillars, the single supervisory mechanism (SSM), and the single resolution mechanism (SRM). The third pillar, the European deposit insurance scheme (EDIS), is under way. Efforts to make CMU operational are also being discussed. Germany has assumed a critical role in the process of EU’s financial integration with some different views from the counter-Germany coalition. Germany has emphasized the importance of a network of the sovereign funds for banks resolution while the counter-coalition members favor the single resolution fund. Other members prefer discretion in SRM but Germany is for rules. And Germany desires to give the Council the decision-making power, however the counter-coalition members want to give the Commission the power. All these differences come from Germany’s emphasis on the Freiburg School’s economic principles of ordoliberalism, which view liability principle (Haftungsprinzip) very crucial for a competitive market economy.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. EU 금융통합의 메커니즘
Ⅲ. 질서자유주의와 금융통합의 제도
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌

키워드

저자

• 백승헌 [ Christopher Paik | 한국은행 경제연구원, 부연구위원, 제1연구자 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  무역통상학회지 [Journal of Korea Research Association of International Commerce]

• 간기

  격월간

• pISSN

  1738-4354

• 수록기간

  2001~2025

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 326 DDC 380