There has been still a controversy about the conflicts between radical feminism and feminism of androgyny, so called the duel between stage two and stage three feminism if we use Julia Kristeva (209), although this kind of dichotomy is almost losing its ground when she says the latter one does not necessarily negate the former because all three feminisms are required and needed for the liberation of women. But the issue here lies at the fact that the harmonious androgyny is still precociously utopian even today when practical feminist issues including abortion and genital mutilation have not been yet remarkably resolved so far. Theories of radical feminism and the debate between stage two and three are still paradoxically needed to lay a foundation on to solve those practical problems of the society. Virginia Woolf’s famous feminist manifesto, A Room of One's Own (1929) is, therefore, still a good literary work to deal with this issue of which is a good or “the” best feminist position. Woolf could formulate and contain her idea of radical feminism in the age of Victorian-Edwardian England in which potently surveillant patriarchy prevailed, while hiding and camouflaging her feminist anger enveloped within the surface of androgyny. Again, however, despite risking the fallacy of authorial intention, which one is Woolf's real voice out of these two? Femininity or Androgyny? The expressed one or the suppressed one behind this narrative? Both or neither? My argument is that Woolf could reveal her anger and rage while pretending to conceal her radical notion of femininity under utopian androgyny. In spite of her fear of being called a radical or sometimes a sappy feminist, she could praise femininity by using multiple personae and evasive narrative technique.
목차
I. Introduction - A debate between feminism and androgyny II. A Room of One's Own and Woolf’s authorial intention III. Epilogue References [Abstract]
국제언어인문학회 [INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR HUMANISTIC STUDIES IN LANGUAGE]
설립연도
2000
분야
인문학>언어학
소개
국제언어인문학회는 '언어를 통한 인문학 연구'의 필요성에 동감하는 여러 전공분야 학자들의 뜻을 담고 있습니다. 언어에 초점을 맞추는 것은, 다양한 전공분야의 참여에서 생겨날 수 있는 '이질적 집합'의 상황을 극복하기 위한 장치입니다. 현재로서는 작은 불씨를 지핀 것에 불과합니다. 그러나 이렇게 일구어진 불꽃이 새로운 학풍의 바람결에 커다란 섬광으로 빛나게 될 날이 올 것을 우리는 확신합니다. 우리의 학회와 학술지는 인문학 불변의 가치와 시대적 사명을 인식하는 국내외의 학자들을 향해 활짝 개방되어 있습니다. 특정 전공의 범위를 넘어서서 철학, 문학, 언어학, 종교, 역사, 문화, 예술 등의 시각에서 언어의 본질을 토론할 기회가 될 것입니다.