Earticle

초록

영어

The present study discusses the methodological issues in the previous studies on intercultural health communication with migrant worker patients. It first points out that most of them have methodologically stuck to record reviews and questionnaire surveys, while only a few have adopted ethnographic approaches. It then argues that regardless of their specific approaches, they have taken “emancipatory modernism” at their heart in light of their advocacy for the less-privileged patients’ human rights and medical welfare despite their nearly exclusive focus on the patients from a limited number of countries and nearly exclusive attention to free-of-charge medical institutions. In so doing, the current study highlights the fact that the emancipatory modernistic studies have not paid sufficient attention to such methodological issues as the institutionally self-implemented distribution of the patients, the peculiarities of each institution, and their diachronic changes. As a result, the present study points out that it is about time for the more critical applied linguistic studies that take transformativity and self-reflexivity into account supplement, if not entirely replace such emancipatory modernistic approaches.

목차

1. 서론
2. 선행 연구
2.1 이주근로자 대상 문화간 의료 커뮤니케이션에 관한 전반적 국내 연구 동향
2.2 의료 담화 연구 방법론 개괄과 국내 연구 동향
2.3 국내 이주근로자 대상 민족지학적 문화간 의료 커뮤니케이션 연구의 동향
2.4 기존 연구의 해방적 근대주의(emancipatory modernism) 고찰
3. 비판응용언어학적 시각에서의 기존 연구의 방법론적 고찰
3.1 기존의 해방적 근대주의적 연구에 대한 반례
3.2 비판응용언어학적 접근법에서 본 기존 연구의 총괄적 방법론적 문제점
3.3 비판응용언어학적 관점에서 본 기존 연구의 구체적 방법론적 문제점
4. 결론 및 제언
4.1 정리
4.2 제안
인용문헌
[Abstract]

키워드

저자

• 김기태 [ Ki-tae Kim | 계명대학교 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  인문언어 [LINGUA HUMANITATIS]

• 간기

  반년간

• pISSN

  1598-2130

• 수록기간

  2000~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 705 DDC 405