Earticle

현재 위치 Home

기업미래통찰(Corporate Foresight)이 중소기업 성과에 미치는 영향 연구 : 혁신성의 매개효과를 중심으로
A Study on Corporate Foresight and Firm Performance in Korean SMEs with Mediating Effect of Innovativeness

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    한국생산성학회 바로가기
  • 간행물
    생산성연구: 국제융합학술지 KCI 등재 바로가기
  • 통권
    제34권 제4호 (2020.12)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.3-36
  • 저자
    정지희, 김영준
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A389883

※ 원문제공기관과의 협약기간이 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.

원문정보

초록

영어
In this VUCA world, all types of business enterprises seek for instruments of sustainable competitive advantages to compete for the future(Hamel and Prahalad, 1994). Since 1950s, corporate foresight emerges as one of the most efficient methods, defined as a set of practice of a organization to lay the foundation for future competitive advantage by detecting discontinuous changes early, interpreting the consequences, and formulate effective responses for the long-term survival and success of the company(Jemala, 2010; Rohrbeck et al., 2015). The corporate foresight process and tools are well documented in literatures of strategic management, innovation management and future studies(Becker, 2002; Daheim and Uerz, 2008; Rohrbeck, 2010; Battistella, 2014; Ruff, 2015). Furthermore, the values of corporate foresight are studied to justify the investment for corporate foresight resources from qualitative studies among large companies(Rohrbeck, 2012; Rohrbeck and Gemünden, 2011; Rohrbeck and Schwarz, 2013). Recently, the positive relations of corporate foresight and firm performance are empirically tested with 7-year longitudinal analysis(Rohrbeck and Kum, 2018). The studies on corporate foresight in Small and Medium Enterprises, however, are scare(Jannek and Burmeister, 2007), which calls for the attention of scholars, managers and policy-makers to upscale SMEs with corporate foresight(Poteraska and Sacio-Szymanska, 2014; Bidaurratzaga and Dell, 2012; Paliokaite 2010). This study intends to fill this gap of corporate foresight researches in SMEs. We investigated the relations of corporate foresight and firm performance with the role of innovativeness among Korean SMEs in manufacturing and service industries. Considering limited data available about SME’s corporate foresight and firm performances, we measured 1) corporate foresight with 11-item instrument from Rohrbeck and Gemünden(2011) and Yoon et al.(2018), 2) innovativeness with 5 questions from Hurley and Hunt(1998) and Kim(2013) and 3) firm performance with 8 items from Henri(2006), Widener(2007) and Kim(2013), with online self-reported questionnaire, directed to the managers of SMEs in Korea. From the hierarchical regression analysis of 203 samples, controling the company age and industry type, we found that 1) corporate foresight has the positive effect on the firm performance(β=.581, p<.001), 2) corporate foresight has the positive effect on the innovativeness of the firm(β=.727, p<.001), 3) innovativeness has the positive effect on the firm performance(β=.539, p<.001), and 4) corporate foresight’s effect on the firm performance is mediated by the innovativeness(β=.252, p=.002). The results of this study confirm and expand the previous studies of Jissink et al.(2014) and Yoon et al.(2018). This study contributes to building the empirical evidence of corporate foresight research in SMEs, which is limited, despite the value of SMEs to the economy. The practical implications for managers and policy makers are as follows. First, CEOs and the top management in SMEs should give their attentions to corporate foresight to identify, observe and interpret factors that induce change, to determine possible organization-specific implications, and to trigger appropriate organizational responses. Second, CEOs and the top management in SMEs should engage their managers in corporate foresight practices, starting from corporate foresight training to vision building toward a desired future so that managers scan environments ahead of competition, and drive decision-making under uncertainties as a routine. Third, CEOs and the top management in SMEs should be open to the collaborative foresight with universities, other firms, and the government within regional or industrial clusters to overcome the liabilities of smallness. The last but the most critical call falls on the policy makers to strengthen the foresight initiatives for SMEs and collaborators as a means for the prosperity of the national economy.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 및 연구 가설
Ⅲ. 연구 방법
Ⅳ. 실증분석 및 결과
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract

저자

  • 정지희 [ JiHee Jung | 고려대학교 기술경영전문대학원 박사과정 ] 주저자
  • 김영준 [ YoungJun Kim | 고려대학교 기술경영전문대학원 교수 ] 교신저자

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    한국생산성학회 [Korea Productivity Association]
  • 설립연도
    1985
  • 분야
    사회과학>경제학
  • 소개
    본 학회는 생산성에 관련된 학술연구의 진흥과 회원상호간의 친목을 도모함을 목적으로 한다. 그리고 다음의 사항에 주력한다. - 생산성에 관련된 학술연구의 진흥 - 생산성 향상을 위한 산학연계의 확립 - 회원상호간의 친교 및 정보교환 강화

간행물

  • 간행물명
    생산성연구: 국제융합학술지 [Productivity Research: An International Interdisciplinary Journal]
  • 간기
    격월간
  • pISSN
    1225-3553
  • 수록기간
    1987~2025
  • 등재여부
    KCI 등재
  • 십진분류
    KDC 325 DDC 330

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 생산성연구: 국제융합학술지 제34권 제4호

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장