As one of the earliest professional Korean historians, the activities of Kim T’aegyŏng (1850–1927) took place against a background of Japanese encroach-ment on the Korean peninsula. As a native of Kaesŏng, Kim tried to establish a historical narrative that would acknowledge both Chosŏn and Kaesŏng, the former capital of the preceding Koryŏ dynasty. Confucian by training and conviction, Kim’s criticism of the bankrupt Chosŏn society was harsh, but the fact that he was a Kaesŏng native played a decisive role in the formation of his historical vision. The former capital of Koryŏ had been at the periphery of Chosŏn politics, but despite its low political status or perhaps because of it, Kaesŏng developed into a city with a bustling economic and intellectual life. As a result, tension developed between the focus of the local view and that of the national view in historical narratives from Kaesŏng. Kim and his predecessors made attempts at adopting a bifocal view of history that would be able to reconcile the divergent views of the state center and the region periphery, but the Japanese annexation of Chosŏn in 1910 undercut these efforts and made them futile.
목차
Abstract INTRODUCTION COMMUNAL AND NATIONAL HISTORIES GINSENG AND INTELLECTUAL PRAGMATISM: KAESŎNG IN LATE CHOSŎN THE LIFE AND TIMES OF KIM T’AEGYŎNG KAESŎNG IN HISTORY GRAFTING KAEGYŎNG ONTO MAINSTREAM CHOSŎN HISTORY GLOSSARY SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY
키워드
KaesŏngKim T’aegyŏng (1850–1927)historiographynational and regional identitiesSin Koryŏsa
저자
REMCO E. BREUKER [ doctoral candidate at Leiden University ]
한국연구원은 1970년 5월 한국 민속의 각 분야에 걸친 자료의 수집과 학술적 연구를 목적으로 '한국민속연구소'로 출발하였다. 그 후 1973년 5월 연구 분야를 확대하며 민속뿐만 아니라 한국학 전반에 걸친 연구를 위해 '한국학연구소'로 개편하였고, 다시 1989년 3월 한국의 국제적 위상의 부상과 함께 한국학 연구의 중요성이 높아짐에 따라 '한국학연구원'으로 확대, 개편하였다. 한국학연구원은 한국학 전반에 걸친 연구를 통해 지역과 민족문화 발전에 기여하며 한국학의 세계화를 위해서 학술활동을 강화하고 나아가 내·외국인에 대한 한국문화 교육을 담당하고자 한다.