This article locates a critical historical shift in modern subject formation in the intellectual discourses from the incipient stage of the Culture Movement between 1914 and 1922. I argue that re-inscribing the nineteenth century modern European discourses on bio-politics, aesthetics, and cultural racism in the context of anti-colonial nationalism, the nationalist reformist discourses of this period produced the colonial-modern subject that is vitalistic, voluntaristic and sovereign in the delimited sphere of culture and aesthetics. The article also demonstrates that this spiritually and aesthetically sovereign subjectivity is simultaneously imbricated with the Korean nationalists’ adaptation of what Foucault defines as “governmentality,” bio-political discipline of the population, to their program of national strengthening and anti-colonial resistance. The first section of the article discusses how the nationalist discourses translated biological and material vitalism, available from Social Darwinism and liberal ideology, into a spiritual brand of vitalism and voluntarism. The second section deals with the convergence between the ideas of sovereignty of self and aesthetics on the one hand and the role of aesthetics as ethnonationalizing and hegemonizing interpellation on the other. The third section examines how the discourse of cultural racism of modern European origin was joined to the conceptions of the sovereign aesthetic subjectivity and bio-political disciplining of the population by focusing on Yi Kwang-su’s writings. Yi Kwang-su couples the need for modern bio-political disciplining of Koreans with moral and cultural reforms that must take place through the construction of a voluntaristic, autonomous self, which, in turn, can occur only through the education of emotion in the sphere of literature, aesthetics and culture. This reform of sentiment, morality, and behaviors is, for Yi, necessarily a program of racial improvement or racial rehabilitation. The specifically colonial characteristic of Yi Kwang-su’s nationalist program that combines these three types of discourses, spiritual vitalism, Romantic notions of self and art and racial rehabilitation, lies in its culturalism. Cultural(-ized) nationalism, on the one hand, silently assists the material bio-political projects of the colonial state, awaiting to metamorphose into the sovereign agent of their implementation in the political sphere in the post-colonial nation-state.
목차
Abstract INTRODUCTION SPIRITUAL VITALISM, LIBERATION OF EMOTION, AND AFFECTIVE SOVEREIGNTY IN THE 1910s 1. From Biological Vitalism to Spiritual and Social Vitalism 2. Liberation of Emotion (chŏng) 3. Emotion, Aesthetic Subject and Affective Sovereignty AESTHETIC INTERPELLATION AND THE PRODUCTION OF THE ETHNONATIONAL SUBJECT 1. Educating Emotion: Voluntarization, Responsibilization and Individualization 2. Aesthetic Discipline and Ethnonationalizing the Aesthetic BIO-POLITICAL REFORMS AND RACIAL REHABILITATION IN YI KWANG-SU’S WRITINGS, 1916-1922 1. Modern Education and Its Bio-political Goals in the Colonial Cultural Sphere 2. Moral Disciplinary Reforms in/as Colonial-Modern Education 3. Auto-racialization and Racial Rehabilitation CONCLUSION WORKS CITED
한국연구원은 1970년 5월 한국 민속의 각 분야에 걸친 자료의 수집과 학술적 연구를 목적으로 '한국민속연구소'로 출발하였다. 그 후 1973년 5월 연구 분야를 확대하며 민속뿐만 아니라 한국학 전반에 걸친 연구를 위해 '한국학연구소'로 개편하였고, 다시 1989년 3월 한국의 국제적 위상의 부상과 함께 한국학 연구의 중요성이 높아짐에 따라 '한국학연구원'으로 확대, 개편하였다. 한국학연구원은 한국학 전반에 걸친 연구를 통해 지역과 민족문화 발전에 기여하며 한국학의 세계화를 위해서 학술활동을 강화하고 나아가 내·외국인에 대한 한국문화 교육을 담당하고자 한다.