독일 고용보험의 적용대상과 관련한 법적 과제 — 외관자영업자와 EU 이민자를 중심으로 —
The Legal Issue of German Unemployment Benefit System related subject of application – focused on a EU Immigrant and Scheinselbständigkeit –
If one person provides independent or factory services to another entity but actually performs non-independent tasks in the employment relationship, there is bogus self employment as a result of establishing a basic contract. To determine whether it is self-employed or not, is a typical characteristic of entrepreneurial behaviour is to provide services according to one's name and bill, and to make independent decisions. Additionally are the following signs important. - Purchasing and selling prices, commodity-related - Personnel question (job, dismissal) - terms of purchase and sale - Free design of activities and working hours - Capital and Self-Working Equipment Use - Self-Customer Acceptance - Advertising measures and independent activities in the business world A verification of bogus self-employment can be carried out by the German Pension Insurance Association, Clearingstelle, any labour court or Health Insurance as social insurance companies. If a self-employed person ar considered fake or bogus by definition of the law, the statutory pension scheme in Germany can demand that fake freelancer will be incorporated into the social insurance sector excluding industrial insurance scheme. The ‘Dano’ case goes right to the heart of the debate on social tourism. Are economically inactive EU-citizens, residing in a Member State of which they are not a national, entitled to social assistance which is granted to nationals of that host Member State? Dano and her son, both Romanian nationals, resided in Germany living with Ms Dano’s Sister who provided for them. Dano claimed unemployment benefits but this was refused. She argued that the principle of nondiscrimination in Article 18 TFEU precluded Germany’s domestic legislation excluding foreign nationals claiming social assistance where they enter the country to obtain such assistance or where the right of residence arises merely as a jobseeker. CJEU judged that Directive 2004/38/EC does not oblige Member States to provide for such assistance, but Art. 18 TFEU, Regulation 883/2004 on the coordination of social security and the Charter of Fundamental Rights might do so in the end. As such the EU Citizenship Directive makes it quite clear that economically inactive persons with insufficient resources of their own cannot claim benefits, at least during the first five years of their stay in another Member State. The CJEU ultimately ruled that Member States are not required to grant this type of social benefit to economically inactive Union citizens.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론 Ⅱ. 독일 고용보험법법상 적용대상 관련 법적 문제 Ⅲ. 독일 사회법전 제3권의 의미에서 외관자영업자의 법적 포섭 Ⅳ. 독일 사회법전 제2권의 의미에서 EU 이민자의 법적 보호 Ⅴ. 결론 참고문헌
한국비교노동법학회 [The Korea Society of Comparative Labor Law]
설립연도
1997
분야
사회과학>법학
소개
본 학회는 1997. 4. 1 창립되어 노동법 분야를 주로 연구하는 단체이다. 본 단체는 국내법, 외국의 노동법 노사관계등의 인접학문분야, 국제노동법 등을 연구함으로써 현재 국내적으로 연구가 미진한 분야의 하나인 노동법 분야의 이론적 발전과 재정립. 진보적 이론 창안과 법해석을 통한 사회적 공헌을 그 목적으로 하고 있다.
학회 회의의 자격은 교수, 박사학위 소지자의 자격을 갖춘자를 정회원, 기타의 자를 준회원 또는 특별회원으로 한다. 본학회는 1998년 이후 '노동법 논총'이라는 학술지를 발간하고, 매년 봄(5월)과 가을(9월) 정기학회를 2회이상 개최한다. 학회의 회원은 전국적으로 교수, 공공단체, 연구기관, 공인노무사 및 변호사 등의 전문가로 구성되어 있다.